Votes at a glance: Chester County Council actions on bids, rezoning first readings and consent items
Loading...
Summary
At its May meeting the Chester County Council approved multiple transportation contracts, consent‑agenda items and two rezoning first readings. The council also approved the consent agenda and several road and resurfacing bids; details and dollar amounts are listed below.
The Chester County Council took a series of routine actions and approvals during its May meeting. The following items were approved by voice vote or roll call as noted:
- Ordinance first reading: Ordinance 2025‑11 (FY2025–26 budget ordinance) — first reading approved (see main budget article for details).
- Rezoning (first reading): CCMA 25‑16 — Abhishek Devgon: rezoning 0.75 acres at 3283 Pinkney Road from R‑2 to General Commercial (GC). First reading approved; planning commission recommended approval 3–1.
- Rezoning (first reading): CCMA 25‑17 — DFI Partners: rezoning approximately 3.02 acres on Cedarhurst Road from ID‑2 (limited industrial) to ID‑3 (general industrial) to accommodate tank storage and an industrial building. Planning commission vote reported 4–0; first reading approved.
- Transportation/roads bids (approved): • RFP 24‑078.04 — Chester CTC 202051 time/money program, awarded to Lineberg Construction, $498,159.69. • RFP 24‑078.01 — Chester CTC 202051 time/money phase 1, awarded to Lineberg Construction, $1,697,338.78. • RFB 2425‑30 — Chester CTC 202051 resurfacing (9 roads), awarded to King Asphalt, $1,024,626.21. • Reimbursement to Roads Department for road and sign materials — $21,676.66 approved.
- Consent agenda (approved): Third readings listed on the consent agenda were approved together: Ordinance 2025‑10 (third reading) and CCMA 25‑13, CCMA 25‑14, CCMA 25‑15 (third readings) per the consent motion.
- Other: Council approved accepting ownership of a petitioned street (action from Transportation Committee) and several individual transportation committee items as presented.
Most routine approvals were passed by voice vote; the council recorded the planning commission recommendations where applicable. No final rezoning ordinances or administrative liquor licenses were finalized at the meeting; rezoning items require additional council readings before final passage.
