Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Dorchester planning committee backs three land-use changes, including rezoning near Rusty’s Driving School
Summary
Dorchester County’s Planning, Development and Building Committee on May 5 unanimously recommended action on three land‑use items, advancing a rezoning request for a lot near Rusty’s Driving School, an amendment to townhouse density standards, and a planning‑fee update.
Dorchester County’s Planning, Development and Building Committee on May 5 unanimously recommended action on three land-use items, advancing a rezoning request for a lot near Rusty’s Driving School, an amendment to townhouse density standards, and a planning-fee update.
The committee recommended second reading for Rezoning Request No. 930, filed as a request by Filosius Hires to rezone about 1 acre at 507 East Fifth North Street (TMS 138-00-013) in the Somerville area from Transitional Residential (TRM) to Office and Institutional (OI). Planning staff told the committee the parcel currently contains an older house that has been used for Rusty’s Driving School and that OI would permit limited commercial uses while still allowing single-family residential if a buyer chose that use.
The zoning presentation said the OI district is intended for transitional locations where residential structures are used commercially and that more intense future redevelopment would likely require annexation for sewer service. Planning staff told the committee the item had previously gone to the Planning Commission in March, which recommended approval.
Planning staff also presented an amendment to the Dorchester County Zoning and Land Development Standards (Ordinance No. 0413, as amended) to align townhouse densities. The change sets townhouse densities in the MUC district to 7.3 units per net acre — the same as the R3 district — and adjusts related off-site connection thresholds from 5 units per acre to 7.3 to keep standards consistent. The county said the goal is to prioritize townhouse development over higher-density multifamily uses within the MUC district. The Planning Commission recommended approval in March; the committee advanced the amendment unanimously.
The committee also advanced an amendment to the county’s planning and zoning fee schedule (Ordinance No. 0413, as amended). The update captures a fiscal-impact-analysis fee that had previously been billed through outside consultants, brings certain miscellaneous conditional-use fees into the schedule, and adds language clarifying that fees do not apply to county-initiated requests. Planning staff described the change as administrative rather than a major fee increase.
Public speakers at the committee meeting questioned aspects of the density change and how it could affect Somerville neighborhoods. Tommy Fagan of 111 Ponderosa Road asked, “OI gives residential? Is allowed residential? I’m sorry?” and county staff confirmed single-family residential is allowed under OI. Resident Linda Haines Wetzel (108 Atlantic Street) urged officials to limit townhouse construction in Somerville, saying, “Don’t you think we have enough townhouses in Somerville? The development is atrocious.” Planning staff responded that the amendment does not change the list of uses already permitted in MUC; rather, it aligns density specifically for townhouse units.
Committee members voted unanimously to recommend the three items for county consideration. The committee vote was recorded as unanimous (3–0) and was reported to the full County Council later in the meeting.
