Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Cdbg Action Plan topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee opens 30‑day public comment on CDBG annual action plan after debate over parks allocation

3193007 · May 5, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff opened a 30‑day public comment period on Bangor’s Community Development Block Grant annual action plan, which assumes roughly $815,000–$820,000 in entitlement and $250,000 in program income; committee members questioned a $233,000 parks/playground allocation and HUD public‑services caps.

Community Development Officer Robinson briefed the committee on the draft 2025 annual action plan for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, saying the memo opens the city’s 30‑day public comment period and that the action plan is posted on the CDBG webpage.

Robinson said staff drafted the plan on the working assumption that federal continuing resolutions will leave entitlement funding at 2024 levels; the memo assumes an allocation “approximately $821,000” and budgets about $250,000 in program income for ongoing residential programs. Robinson said staff updated the needs assessment in 2024 and that the public engagement process — five neighborhood meetings plus a community‑wide session at the Cross Insurance Center — showed affordable housing, healthcare and homelessness as the highest priorities.

Several councilors pressed staff about line‑item allocations. Councilor Landry thanked staff for the work but questioned why parks and playgrounds appear as a $233,000 line item when the community’s top priorities in engagement exercises were affordable housing, homelessness and mental health. Landry said CDBG money can be used strategically to address housing needs and expressed concern that the parks allocation does not align with the stated priorities.

Staff and the parks department explained the historical use of CDBG for public infrastructure investments in low‑ to moderate‑income census tracts — including playground replacements and street/sidewalk work — and identified Williams Park as the intended site for the current playground project. Robinson and other staff said the public‑services funding lines are near HUD’s cap; staff noted a typical 15% cap on public services, and that the draft action plan shows about $128,000 allocated to public services (under the cap amount cited in committee remarks as roughly $168,000).

Robinson said more detailed project lists and supporting engagement data will appear with the consolidated plan later in the summer and that the committee will hold a formal public hearing during the comment period before sending the plan to full council.

Why it matters: CDBG funding decisions determine local investments that target low‑ and moderate‑income neighborhoods. Committee members’ questions indicate councilors are weighing whether the draft allocations match community priorities identified in outreach.