Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Case for addition at 4771–4775 Cumberland Circle postponed after neighbor concern over narrow driveways and utilities
Summary
The Zoning Board of Adjustment postponed a request to legalize an existing structure and allow a home addition at a Cumberland Circle property so the applicant can submit a modified site plan addressing driveway clearance, utility access and potential electrical‑meter relocation.
Get email alerts on the Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Zoning Board of Adjustment on May 5 postponed a special‑exception request concerning 4771/4775 Cumberland Circle so the applicant can return with a modified site plan that addresses neighbor concerns about driveway clearance and utility access.
Staff (Blanca Perez, Planning and Inspections) presented the request for special exception B (two or more nonconforming lots) and special exception K (existence 15 years or more) to legalize an existing structure and permit an addition. The property is in an R‑4 residential historic zone; staff said an aerial photograph from February 2009 supports the applicant’s claim that part of the structure has existed for more than 15 years. Notices were mailed to owners within 300 feet on April 25.
The applicant’s designer, Jorge Nunez, and owner Patricia Beltran explained the proposal and said they agree with staff recommendations, including relocating or removing a small accessory shed. Multiple neighbors—Guillermo Correa and Alejandra Correa—spoke at the podium, saying the neighborhood was built in the 1920s–30s, the driveways are narrow and shared clearance is limited. Neighbors pointed out an electrical meter and other utilities near the proposed footprint and said vehicles currently require alternating use of space to get out of parked cars.
Board members and staff discussed options: Andrew Salone (Planning and Inspections) offered to meet on‑site with the applicant and neighbors to mark the proposed footprint with spray paint so neighbors can visualize clearance and coordinate changes. Planning staff noted the applicant can modify the footprint downward before a board vote; building permits and utility relocations would be handled later in the permitting process. Board members also suggested the applicant check with El Paso Electric about relocating the meter; staff and the applicant confirmed that moving the meter could create additional cost and process issues.
Elizabeth Thurman Binkson moved to postpone the item until the applicant provides a clearer, modified site plan and has resolved outstanding utility questions; the motion carried by voice vote. The board asked the applicant to return when neighbors and the applicant have reviewed a revised footprint and utilities have been explored.

