Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Landmarks Preservation Commission issues certificates of appropriateness for 11 properties, planning board informed

3191132 · May 5, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Planning Board received a report that the Landmarks Preservation Commission issued four certificates of appropriateness on March 13 and seven on April 10 for historic properties across Baltimore County.

The Planning Board was notified at its May 1 meeting that the Baltimore County Landmarks Preservation Commission issued certificates of appropriateness for 11 properties across two recent meetings.

Staff reported that at its March 13 meeting the commission issued certificates for four properties: the Hadaway property at 4946 Tulip Avenue in Relay; the Hart property at 410 Fairmount Avenue in Towson; the Carnaval property at 800 Francis Avenue in Halethorpe; and the Rogueme House at 14943 York Road in Sparks.

At its April 10 meeting the commission issued certificates for seven properties: the Monde property at 1554 South Rolling Road in Haworth; the Hammond property at 710 Clifton Road in Pikesville; the Mitchell property at 2101 Mount Carmel Road in Parkton; the Scott property at 315 Central Avenue in Glendora; the Schulman property at 614 Milford Mill Road in Pikesville; the Wheaton property at 207 West Seminary Avenue in Lutherville; and a Baltimore County property at 1935 Black River Neck Road in Essex.

Why it matters: certificates of appropriateness indicate the Landmarks Preservation Commission has approved proposed exterior changes or work that affects a property’s historic character under the county’s landmarks rules. The board was reminded that one member of the Planning Board serves on the Landmarks Preservation Commission and staff solicited volunteers to serve in that role going forward.

No vote was required of the Planning Board; staff concluded the report and thanked commission staff for the update.