District discusses LETRS training gaps and forms plan for AI policy and teacher professional development

District academic staff updated the board on two professional‑development priorities: implementation of LETRS literacy training for elementary teachers and the formation of a district committee to develop artificial‑intelligence policy and training.

LETRS training: staff said the intermediate unit’s (IU) LETRS trainer retired and the IU is no longer certifying staff as LETRS trainers. The chief academic officer, Mr. Kumar, explained the district considered sending employees for trainer certification at the State College training but that mode would limit trainers to providing training only through that provider’s site. As a result, staff said they are pursuing an alternative trainer through an organization in Harrisburg (referred to in the discussion) and plan to build district‑led professional development as a backup so teachers receive the instructional knowledge even if they do not receive an external certification. Board members praised staff who piloted and led training work and asked for clarity on certification versus instructional readiness.

AI policy and professional development: Mr. Kumar told the board the district will form an AI committee made up of administrators and other staff to draft a district policy on use of artificial intelligence, to design professional development for teachers, and to develop instructional guidance for students. Staff framed three committee priorities: 1) create a district policy governing AI use; 2) provide professional development to help teachers use AI productively and safely; and 3) produce instructional materials to teach students appropriate use and critical evaluation of AI outputs. Board members stressed that any policy should include consequences for misuse and should be aligned with classroom practice; several members urged a tight policy and clear consequences.

Why it matters: teachers and students are encountering AI tools in everyday tasks and schools must balance instructional benefit with academic integrity and safety. Staff said the intent is to prepare students and staff to use AI tools thoughtfully and to ensure district policy is specific and enforceable.

Next steps: staff will assemble the AI committee, pursue external LETRS trainer options, and design district PD and instructional supports; items will be returned to the board as policy and implementation plans are developed.