Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Federal Research Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate adopts resolution urging restoration of proposed NIH funding after members debate federal cuts
Summary
The California Senate on the floor adopted a resolution urging the federal government to rescind proposed cuts to National Institutes of Health funding after extended debate about research impacts, budgets and lifesaving clinical trials.
Get email alerts on the Federal Research Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The California Senate voted to adopt Senate Joint Resolution 4 on the floor, urging the federal government to rescind proposed cuts to National Institutes of Health funding and restore research support for California institutions.
Author Sen. John Laird, speaking on the measure, said the proposed federal reductions “are 40%” and argued the cuts would substantially harm research programs and institutions across the state. He asked members to join in elevating the voices of researchers, patients and families affected by the proposed cuts.
The resolution drew a wide-ranging floor debate. Opponents of the measure said federal budget difficulties require scrutiny of spending. "We have to make sure our organizations are accountable," said Sen. Sierato, explaining she would oppose the resolution because she wanted more accounting of how federal research dollars are spent. Several members framed the issue as both fiscal and moral.
Supporters warned of immediate impacts to clinical trials, university research infrastructure and jobs. "You are killing people with these cuts," said Sen. Cabaldon, describing patients whose clinical trials would be disrupted. Sen. Winter called the cuts "a wrecking ball" to federal agencies and said the reductions were not proportional to the federal budget deficit, adding, "This is such a microscopic part of the federal budget." Sen. Strickland characterized the debate as requiring principle, calling the opponents' arguments "chutzpah." Several senators representing UC and CSU campuses detailed how NIH grants support facilities, hazardous-waste disposal, staff and ongoing clinical trials.
Senate leadership called the roll call; the resolution passed with 26 ayes and 6 no votes. The Senate’s roll call and several floor comments identified the scope of the concern as affecting NIH and other federal science agencies.
The resolution does not itself change appropriations; it asks the federal government to restore previously appropriated research funding. The floor debate indicated follow-up actions would involve outreach to federal officials and coordination with university leadership and the state attorney general.
