Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Rezoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Eau Claire County planning director reviews rezoning process for board
Summary
Director of Planning and Development reviewed the county rezoning process, town roles, soil and density considerations, and effects of conditional-use law as supervisors asked questions about cross-jurisdiction projects and farmland preservation.
Radha Eslinger, Eau Claire County director of planning and development, gave a step‑by‑step “refresher” on the county’s rezoning process during the Board of Supervisors meeting on May 6, explaining how petitions move from a property owner’s application to staff review, town input, a Planning and Development Committee public hearing and the county board’s final action.
Eslinger told supervisors the process “starts with the property owner” who files a rezoning application, and staff then prepares a fact sheet and notice area. She said towns that have adopted county zoning have a statutory role: if a town objects, the Planning and Development Committee cannot recommend approval over that town’s objection. She added staff includes the town’s recommendation in the committee and board materials.
The presentation noted the county uses maps comparing current zoning to future‑land‑use (comprehensive plan) maps and examines adjacent land use and soil classifications. Eslinger said the county flags “prime soils” (class 1, 2 and 3) when a petition would remove land from agricultural‑preservation districts. She described the technical paperwork that accompanies petitions, including legal descriptions and a rezoning checklist staff provides applicants.
Supervisors asked detailed procedural and policy questions. Supervisor Zook asked how the term “density” is applied; Eslinger replied that density is effectively set by zoning district standards such as minimum lot sizes (she cited an example where an A2 district’s minimum lot size is 5 acres and an A3 district’s is 20 acres) and that the number of lots possible depends on the parcel size and practical constraints such as road frontage. Eslinger also warned that conditional‑use decisions are governed by case law and state law changes she referenced as “Act 67,” and that denials of conditional uses must be supported by “substantial evidence” in the committee’s findings to withstand appeal to the Board of Land Use Appeals.
Supervisors also asked about cross‑jurisdiction projects. Supervisor Larry asked about projects that would span counties (for example, a hospital), and staff advised that such facilities typically are in municipalities because of sewer/water needs and would go through the municipality’s permitting processes; staff said the village of Lake Hallie administers its zoning and works with the Triple County zoning office on technical assistance.
On farmland preservation, Eslinger said participation is voluntary and depends on zoning status: towns that have adopted county zoning can participate; unzoned towns cannot unless an agricultural enterprise area is established through the Land Conservation Commission and state review (the presenter identified the Land Conservation manager as the contact for that process). She confirmed that seven of the county’s 13 towns have adopted county zoning, five towns are unzoned, and one town (Lincoln) has its own town zoning and administers it locally.
Eslinger closed by inviting supervisors to call staff with questions and asked, “Are we getting you enough information? Are we getting you the right information?”
Why it matters: Rezoning determines how land can be used, affects farmland preservation and development patterns, and carries legal constraints (notice requirements, town input and state statutes) that shape what the county can and cannot require or deny.
