Landmark commissioners discuss appeal reversing a windows decision and request training with zoning board

Landmark commissioners used a May 5 meeting discussion item to review an appeal of a recent decision that the Zoning Board of Adjustment overturned on a windows issue. Vice Chairperson Christian Bourgeois raised concerns that the zoning board found the Landmark Commission had not followed its own rules in that case and sought staff guidance on how to reduce future reversals.

Staff members explained the zoning board’s role as an appeals body that reviews whether the commission followed its procedures and regulations. Staff advised commissioners that when a motion departs from staff recommendations, the commission should clearly state on the record the specific reasons and tie those reasons to sections of the Design Standards for Historic Properties. The transcript notes staff provides the zoning board with the applicant’s narrative, the original staff report and a transcript of the Landmark Commission meeting.

Commissioners discussed whether the zoning board has sufficient expertise in historic-design rules and whether better coordination or joint training sessions could reduce misunderstandings. Staff suggested they would propose a training or joint meeting with the zoning board’s chair to review appeals procedures and expectations. Commissioners also noted that when Landmark Commission members attend a zoning-board appeal proceeding, they may speak during the public hearing but only the chair or vice chair can officially represent the commission.

Speakers urged clearer on-the-record rationale for decisions that differ from staff recommendations to strengthen the commission’s position if an appeal occurs. Staff noted appeals are uncommon and offered to work with the zoning board on training.

—