Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Construction Financing Fast Track topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee approves third round of fast-track financing adjustments to close construction gaps on at-risk projects
Summary
The committee approved staff recommendations to reallocate funds and continue a fast-track assistance program that supplements existing loans for affordable housing projects facing construction cost overruns; members asked for district notifications and cost-per-unit data.
Get email alerts on the Construction Financing Fast Track topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Los Angeles City Council Homelessness and Housing Committee voted May 14 to approve modified financing recommendations for a fast-track assistance program that provides supplemental loans or grants to affordable housing projects facing construction cost increases.
LAHD staff described the program as a response to construction-cost inflation and contractor disputes that threaten project completion. The department said this is the third round of assistance and that prior rounds collectively redirected tens of millions of dollars originally slated for new construction to support existing projects. Staff cited past totals in discussion (figures discussed in the meeting included $44.6 million for earlier rounds and a broader $62 million cumulative amount across programs), and said the current proposal would draw on available balances across two funds rather than impose a $15 million cap stated in an earlier draft report.
Committee members asked for clearer reporting on which projects received fast-track assistance, the cost per unit after supplemental awards and whether assistance is concentrated in particular council districts. A member requested that the council office be notified when a fast-track award is made for a project in their district and asked for side-by-side cost-per-unit comparisons. LAHD staff agreed to provide district notifications and application data.
The committee approved the recommendations as modified by staff by a 3-0 vote. Councilmembers Rahman, Jurado and Bloomfield voted yes.
Members emphasized the need for portfolio-level oversight to avoid repeatedly reallocating new-construction funds to shore up existing projects without a broader strategy tying allocations to overall unit production goals.

