Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Strategic Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
SF Arts Commission begins strategic-plan visioning; community survey finds grants and artist basic needs top priorities
Summary
AMS Planning and Research presented research at the San Francisco Arts Commission's May 5 special meeting showing nearly 1,000 community engagements. Respondents ranked direct grantmaking, cultural centers and public art as top priorities and called for better interdepartmental coordination and support for artist housing and basic needs.
The San Francisco Arts Commission on May 5 opened a multi-hour strategic-planning workshop with a presentation from AMS Planning and Research that summarized public engagement and research ahead of a new five-year plan.
Consultants Bill Blake and Lauren Frankel told commissioners the research had reached "nearly a thousand people," including stakeholder interviews, an online community survey, and in‑person open houses. The survey received about 730 responses and the team said roughly 100 stakeholders and more than 100 open-house participants also contributed input.
Key findings presented to commissioners and staff included strong public support for direct grantmaking, continued investment in cultural centers, and high value placed on public art. At the same time, the consultants said many respondents reported low awareness of SFAC programs: only about a third said they were well informed about the commission's work.
"Grant making just really tops the list," Lauren Frankel said as she summarized survey responses that placed unrestricted or direct support to artists and organizations above other functions.
The research highlighted a repeated theme that emerged across stakeholder interviews and community input: basic needs for artists — particularly housing, stable compensation and health-care access — were a top priority when participants were asked to choose three funding priorities. Commissioners and staff raised the need to consider how the agency could work with other city departments to address those issues.
AMS also presented a peer-city scan showing a range of organizational models. Blake noted some cities (Austin, Chicago, Denver) have consolidated multiple arts- and events-related functions under single departments; others (Los Angeles, New York, Seattle) keep arts funding and commercial event or tourism functions separated.
Commissioners took part in a facilitated exercise to articulate what the commission should "stand for" and "stand against," then used a resource-allocation exercise (pom-poms) and a 20-year hypothetical press-release exercise to identify desired long-term impacts and immediate priorities for the plan.
Commissioners and staff discussed next steps for the planning timetable. AMS described the work as moving into phase 4 (visioning and goal-setting) through the spring and summer, followed by business planning and budgeting work in a phase 5 that would feed a final plan to the mayor and Board of Supervisors. AMS and SFAC staff said they would continue work with the commission's strategic-planning steering committee and staff representatives in coming weeks.
Votes at a glance: The meeting also included a consent calendar vote. Commissioner Beltran moved to approve the consent calendar and Commissioner Walker seconded; the motion was approved unanimously by commissioners present.
