Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Election Administration topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Michigan House rejects proposed constitutional proof-of-citizenship amendment after lengthy debate
Summary
The House debated and voted on House Joint Resolution B, which would have required proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote and expanded ID requirements; the resolution failed to achieve the two-thirds threshold for adoption.
The Michigan House of Representatives debated House Joint Resolution B (HJRB), a proposed constitutional amendment that would require proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote and require photo ID to cast a ballot. After extended floor debate, the House recorded 58 yes votes and 48 no votes; because a two-thirds vote is required to adopt a constitutional amendment in the House, the resolution was not adopted.
Why it matters: supporters argued the measure would secure elections by verifying citizenship and preventing noncitizen voting; opponents said it would create burdens that disproportionately affect seniors, low-income voters and women who changed their names, and could functionally disenfranchise eligible voters.
Debate highlights: Rep. Song urged colleagues to vote no, saying the measure ‘‘will disproportionately burden our senior citizens’’ and could require documentary proof that many voters do not readily have. Rep. Colazar and Rep. Sernigloo described real-world examples from other states in which proof-of-citizenship laws resulted in many lawful voters being suspended from registration. Rep. Bolen and Majority Floor Leader Posthumus defended the proposal as a necessary safeguard and framed it as complementary to Real ID efforts; Posthumus said Michigan’s election system should be ‘‘more secure than the honor system.’’
Outcome: The clerk announced the roll-call result as 58 ayes and 48 nays. Because the Constitution requires a two-thirds majority in the House to place a constitutional amendment on the ballot, the resolution did not meet the threshold and was not adopted on that vote. The transcript records subsequent procedural motions to reconsider and to ‘‘pass for the day’’ but does not show the resolution being adopted in this session.
Context: Speakers on both sides cited experience in other states (Kansas, Arizona) and statistics about noncitizen registrations; supporters said the state can provide free IDs and documentation where needed, while opponents warned that cost and bureaucratic obstacles would fall disproportionately on vulnerable groups.
Votes at a glance: House Joint Resolution B — Recorded roll-call: 58 yes, 48 no; outcome: not adopted (did not reach two-thirds required for constitutional amendment).
