Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Pensions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Birmingham mayor warns $400 retiree increase would require $18.1 million up front, could strain city budget
Summary
Mayor Randall L. Whitman told the City Council that a board recommendation to give all retirees a $400 monthly increase for one year would require an upfront payment of about $18.1 million and must be paid from the city operating budget because the pension lacks a surplus.
Mayor Randall L. Whitman told the Birmingham City Council on April 29 that a pension-board recommendation to increase retiree pay by $400 per month for 12 months would require the city to pay about $18.1 million up front and could not be funded from the pension because the fund has no surplus.
Whitman said the board's April vote was advisory and repeated his warning: "The Board's vote was a recommendation, only it was not binding. I want to repeat that." He added, "The actuary has confirmed that 100% of the cost of the increase would have to be paid upfront before the increase could be paid to the retirees."
The mayor told the council the pension plan currently covers about 3,700 retirees and that the one-time increase would cost roughly $18,100,000. He said the city's most recent annual contribution to the plan is "more than $35,000,000," and that the pension "does not currently have a surplus to support such a recommended increase, which means any increase would have to be supported by the city's operating budget." Whitman stressed his dual role, saying he speaks both as mayor and as chair of the pension board.
Why it matters: Council members expressed concern that committing to an $18.1 million upfront cost while the city is preparing next-year revenue projections could jeopardize other obligations. The mayor framed the discussion as one of long-term solvency: "The priority is to make sure we can fund the pension. We'll continue to consider the needs of the retirees along with our current employees, along with our residents, along with our city's infrastructure," he said.
Council reaction and context: Council members who spoke acknowledged sympathy for retirees but urged caution. A council member, speaking on the record without a name in the meeting transcript, said they did not want future retiree payments to shortchange the operating budget and noted the recurring nature of any ongoing obligation. Whitman provided additional context about statutory minimums: he said the statutory minimum retirement benefit is $400 per month and the statutory minimum for a surviving spouse is $320 per month and that only 33 retirees currently receive the $400 statutory minimum. He also said the average retiree benefit is roughly $2,200 monthly.
Next steps: Whitman said it would be premature to commit to the proposed increase while the city finalizes revenue projections for the upcoming fiscal year. No formal action or vote on the $400 recommendation was taken at the April 29 meeting; the discussion remained advisory and informational.
Details and clarifying figures discussed during the meeting: 3,700 retirees (approx.), $18,100,000 estimated upfront cost for a one-year $400/month increase for all retirees, current annual city contribution to the pension of more than $35,000,000, statutory minimums of $400 (retiree) and $320 (surviving spouse), and an average retiree benefit around $2,200 monthly. All numerical values and program descriptions come from Mayor Whitman's remarks to the council during the April 29 meeting.
Ending: Council members asked the administration to continue to share actuarial and budget projections as staff prepare the next fiscal-year budget; no binding decision was reached at the meeting.
