Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Professional Licensing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee gives favorable report to bill aligning landscape-architect licensure with CLARB
Summary
A legislative committee voted to give a favorable report to a bill that would align the board overseeing landscape-architect licensure with the Council of Landscape Architectural Registration Boards (CLARB) to streamline reciprocity across the U.S. and Canada. The measure passed by voice vote; no roll-call tally was recorded in the transcript.
Get email alerts on the Professional Licensing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
During a committee meeting, members gave a favorable report on a bill that would align the board of examiners of landscape architects with the Council of Landscape Architectural Registration Boards (CLARB), an organization that supports licensure reciprocity across the United States and Canada.
The measure, described by a committee presenter as intended to create "a more consistent licensure requirement across the United States and Canada," drew no recorded questions in the transcript and was recommended for a favorable report.
The presenter asked members for a favorable report, saying, "If there's any questions, I would just ask for favorable reports." A motion to give the bill a favorable report was made by Underwood and seconded by Representative Bracey. The committee approved the motion by voice vote; the transcript records an "Aye" and no recorded opposition. The transcript does not include a roll-call tally or a bill number.
The bill as described in the meeting would use CLARB's reciprocity framework to address licensure portability for landscape architects between jurisdictions in the U.S. and Canada. Specific statutory citations, bill number, and implementation details were not specified in the transcript.
No amendments or conditions were recorded during the discussion. The committee's favorable report moves the bill forward in the legislative process; the transcript does not indicate the next scheduled steps or a committee name beyond the generic meeting context.
Details missing from the record include the bill number, the full committee name, the exact text of the motion, and any roll-call votes. The presenter’s explanation and the committee's voice approval are the only items recorded in the provided transcript excerpt.

