Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Special Education topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District outlines response to AEA restructuring, proposes special‑education leadership hire
Summary
Board heard a report on statewide AEA changes under House File 2612 and the district’s plan to use retained special‑education funds to add a dedicated special‑education lead to manage compliance, IEP processes and staff support.
Get email alerts on the Special Education topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Administrators told the board that statewide changes to Area Education Agencies (AEA) under House File 2612 have reduced regional AEA staffing and shifted many services to a fee‑for‑service model, prompting Urbandale Community School District to propose internal adjustments and targeted hires.
An administrator briefed the board on the AEA changes, listing consolidation of special education regions from eight to four (plus Des Moines), staff reductions at the Heartland AEA and that some services previously provided without separate fees are now chargeable. The district projected roughly $458,000 available for combined educational and media services after nonpublic allocations, and said special‑education flow‑through funding to the district is typically a little more than $1 million; the district will retain 10% of that next year (about $107,000) to use locally.
Melanie, speaking as the special‑education lead in the district presentation, told the board the reduction in AEA staff will lower the number of AEA professionals available for day‑to‑day support (school psychologists, social workers, special‑education consultants, speech/language pathologists, occupational and physical therapists and vision/hearing providers). She said AEA Child Find support for attending every IEP meeting will be limited going forward; Child Find staff will attend initial IEPs, reevaluations and complex cases but not routine meetings.
District administrators presented a plan for spending the retained 10% locally. Proposed uses included a special‑education leadership role (a teacher‑contract position with full release time plus additional days) focused on IEP writing, specially designed instruction (SDI) coaching, compliance with Chapter 103 seclusion/restraint paperwork, Medicaid billing oversight and quality of 504 plans. Administrators noted contracting AEA services on a daily fee basis (cited in the presentation at $900 per day) would be substantially more expensive than hiring district staff for ongoing needs.
Administrators also reviewed changes to media and educational services previously provided by the AEA. Media services (library/resource access and ed‑tech program access) and many professional learning offerings are moving to purchase‑or‑subscribe models; professional learning sessions must be approved by the Department of Education under the new rules. The district said it reviewed duplicative resources, evaluated what to continue purchasing and plans to maintain professional networks for collaboration.
The board approved the proposed special‑education lead position. During discussion members asked about the role’s duties and whether it would be a full‑release teacher position; administrators confirmed the intent was a full‑release role on the teacher salary schedule with additional days and that candidates would be expected to have experience serving special‑education students.
Administrators said the district will continue coordinating with the AEA and other districts, and that some services will be purchased on a fee‑for‑service basis when appropriate. They flagged the state’s incoming differentiated accountability process (IDEA/DA) and said the district is preparing to meet upcoming review requirements.

