Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Criminal Justice topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee adopts substitute for bill requiring warrant checks before release or parole
Summary
The committee adopted a substitute to require the Department of Corrections and the Board of Pardons and Paroles to check criminal-warrant databases (including NCIC) before processing releases, and issued a favorable report; members raised concerns about coverage, local burden and database completeness.
Get email alerts on the Criminal Justice topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The House Judiciary Committee adopted a substitute and moved a favorable report on Senate Bill 89, a measure that would require the Department of Corrections (DOC) and the Board of Pardons and Paroles to check criminal-warrant databases — specifically the NCIC — to determine whether an individual in custody has outstanding warrants before release, work release or parole.
Committee debate focused on implementation burdens and whether checking NCIC alone would be sufficient. Members and law-enforcement-affiliated speakers said many local warrants, especially municipal misdemeanors or traffic failure-to-appear entries, are not entered into NCIC; county courts and local agencies may not forward warrants to statewide databases. Several members suggested adding checks of other statewide court or law-enforcement systems such as the Administrative Office of Courts (AOC) warrant lists or other criminal databases available in Alabama.
Supporters said the substitute inserted clearer benchmarks and that the requirement would at least reduce some instances in which people leave custody and are later arrested on older warrants. Critics warned the bill shifts operational burdens to DOC and parole staff and may set those agencies up to fail without better data flows from local courts. Committee members discussed coordinating with AOC and other systems and forming a technical work group in the off-session to refine the measure.
The committee adopted the substitute, took testimony and then voted to give the bill a favorable report. Several members said they would work with the sponsor and stakeholders during the interim to broaden database checks and reduce implementation strain.

