Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council receives overview of Tax Allocation Districts; staff outlines balances and ongoing projects

3151671 · April 29, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Deputy City Manager Pam Hodge reviewed eight TADs in Muscogee County, balances and approved projects including Riverfront Place (WC Bradley) and Midland Commons; councilors asked for performance comparisons and valuation detail.

Deputy City Manager Pam Hodge presented a Tax Allocation District (TAD) overview and update to council, describing how TADs (a Georgia form of tax increment financing) work, the approval process, and current district balances.

Hodge said the city has eight active TAD districts — Second Avenue City Village, Uptown, Sixth Avenue/Liberty District, South Columbus River District, Midland Commons, Midtown East, Midtown West and Benning Technology Park — and she presented balances and project counts for each. She noted some districts were created as project‑specific TADs and others were created as geographic redevelopment areas with projects submitted afterwards.

Staff recapped council‑approved projects that are receiving TAD reimbursements: WC Bradley’s Riverfront Place (a $52 million project over 20 years, with payouts of roughly $3.6 million to date), the Ram Broad Street alley/placemaking project ($1.7 million over five years, with $1.4 million paid to date), the Highside Market/Cotton Company redevelopment ($2.4 million over five years), Midland Commons (a $14.5 million project over 20 years), and a Naval Works housing project ($10.1 million over 19 years).

Councilor Lehi Davis asked for performance and valuation comparisons against the projections used when the TAD redevelopment plans were adopted; Davis asked staff to provide year‑over‑year certified values for the districts alongside the consultant’s initial projections. Hodge and the tax assessor’s office said valuations and increments are certified annually to the Department of Revenue and that new construction’s assessed value is captured as it is completed, which can make multi‑year projects ramp up over time.

Hodge said developer agreements include schedules and mechanisms for reimbursement and that in some agreements there are provisions to extend payment windows if projected increment did not materialize in the original time frame.

Ending: Staff agreed to provide council a comparison between initial redevelopment projections and actual certified assessed values/collections to date for the TAD districts and to return with additional material to clarify timing and projected versus realized increments.