Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety And Parks topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cemetery vandalism prompts discussion of cameras, signage and a small repairs fund
Summary
Council reviewed recent cemetery damage, existing limited camera coverage, and a proposed small 'miscellaneous damages' budget line; staff will provide cost estimates for improved surveillance (running power/cable could cost $5,000–$10,000) and plans to add signage and temporary wildlife cameras.
Get email alerts on the Public Safety And Parks topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council members discussed vandalism at the city cemetery, current limited camera coverage and a newly proposed budget line to cover small repair and replacement costs after the meeting packet showed recent damage.
Staff reported a recent incident in which a granite headstone and concrete base sustained chips; drone images and before/after photos are used periodically to document condition and show change over time. Staff said there are two existing cameras mounted near the restroom area that capture roughly 100 feet of the site, but the cemetery lacks full entry/exit coverage. Those two cameras were provided without ongoing monthly cost and were installed with help from state fire resources, staff said.
Council discussed options to increase surveillance and deter theft, including wildlife or motion‑activated cameras that can be placed high and that are less vulnerable to tampering, and signs stating the area is under surveillance. Staff estimated that running power and wiring to cover cemetery entrances with cameras could cost on the order of $5,000 to $10,000 for cabling and installation; solar or wireless options were mentioned as alternatives. The mayor said the packet included a new line (1077650) described as 'miscellaneous damages' to fund small replacements; staff said this fund would cover minor vandalism or replacement needs and that it had not previously been used in eight years.
Council directed staff to provide a full all‑in estimate for entrance and perimeter cameras (including power/cabling or solar alternatives) and to pursue additional motion‑activated cameras and signage as a near-term step; staff committed to obtaining a more complete price in follow-up. There was no formal vote recorded; the council approved the staff request to pursue estimates and follow up in the budget process.
