Development review committee refers Hoover’s Hideaway RV Park final plan to department heads
Summary
At its April 22 meeting the Development Review Committee recommended final approval of FD24-002, Hoover’s Hideaway RV Park, forwarding the plan to department heads after no departmental objections were recorded.
The Development Review Committee on April 22 recommended that department heads consider final approval of FD24-002, Hoover’s Hideaway RV Park, the committee chair said during the meeting.
Tabitha Bostick, chair and a staff member with Development Services, opened the meeting and said, “Today, we have 1 project that is being recommended to the department heads for approval.” The item was identified on the agenda as Tab A, FD24-002, Hoover’s Hideaway RV Park.
Representatives from the Building Department, Planning Department, Development Services, the Health Department and the Fire Department each stated they had no further comments on the item. Constance Lake, representing the Building Department, said there were no comments. Elizabeth Back, representing the Planning Department, said there were no further comments. Tim Davidson, representing Development Services, and Ronnie Nestor, representing the Health Department, each said they had no further comments. Amanda Bauman, representing the Fire Department, also said there were no further comments and the chair then closed the meeting.
The committee did not record a formal vote in the transcript. The recorded action is a recommendation (referral) to department heads for their review and potential approval; no objections were stated on the record.
The Development Review Committee did not discuss conditions, changes to the plan, or technical recommendations during the recorded segment. The meeting began with the chair announcing the single agenda item and concluded after the listed department representatives reported no comments.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
