Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use And Environment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Teton County to weigh in on Caribou‑Targhee resort expansion; commissioners discuss consultants, public engagement
Summary
Teton County staff will prepare a decision memo and likely a formal comment package on the Caribou‑Targhee National Forest DEIS for a proposed Targhee Resort boundary expansion after commissioners asked for more analysis, consultant cost estimates and public briefings.
Teton County commissioners discussed the Caribou‑Targhee National Forest draft environmental impact statement (DEIS) for a proposed expansion of Targhee Resorts during their April 21 voucher meeting and agreed to develop a coordinated county response.
Chris Colligan, Public Works project manager, reported staff outreach to four consulting firms that estimated a “light‑touch” peer review of the DEIS would cost roughly $7,000–$10,000 and take about 40 hours. Colligan said consultants questioned how much influence a county peer review would have on the final Forest Service decision and noted that substantial nexus for developer mitigation may lie with future local development permits rather than directly inside the DEIS text.
Commissioners asked for a short decision memo laying out options—whether to submit detailed comments, request a Forest Service presentation at a board meeting, or pursue consultant review and possible litigation later. They directed staff to: prepare a draft decision document that weighs costs, revenue impacts and service‑cost nexus (housing mitigation, road impact fees and public safety costs); coordinate an invitation to Forest Service staff to brief the board; and explore a joint meeting with Teton County, Idaho commissioners to share concerns raised during the DEIS public meetings.
Staff emphasized that the county’s formal comments should clarify the board’s preferred alternative (if any) and identify gaps in the DEIS socioeconomic analysis, particularly related to projected employee numbers and housing mitigation needs. Colligan noted the public EIS meeting had drawn about 300 attendees and that the county is preparing to track possible downstream impacts to intergovernmental agreements and developer mitigation commitments.
No final county decision was made at the meeting; commissioners signaled they expect to revisit the item after staff circulates a draft decision memo and attempts to schedule the requested external briefings and any needed public input sessions.
