Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Court Fees topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commissioners review ordinance to renew additional court fees for courthouse operations

3807180 · April 23, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

County staff presented an ordinance that would add or renew a set of court filing and service fees, with revenue restricted to courthouse construction, maintenance, and related costs. Auditor—s office requested the renewal; transcript did not record a formal final vote in the excerpt.

County staff presented an ordinance to add and renew several court-related fees and direct the revenue to courthouse facility costs.

Under the proposed ordinance text read into the record: a $10 fee would be added to probate fees; $20 would be added to misdemeanor court costs; $10 would be added to final fees in small-claims cases; $10 would be added to district civil case filing fees; and a $10 charge would apply for each subpoena or civil summons served. The ordinance text said those receipts would be remitted to the county and maintained in a fund used exclusively for courthouse construction, renovation, maintenance and operations, bond payments on courthouse projects, and administrative expenses related to Carroll County Circuit and District Court.

A county speaker said the auditor (Miss Melcher) asked the county to renew the ordinance and that the fees are the same as previously imposed. The transcript excerpt did not include a formal roll-call vote on the ordinance within the provided segment; commissioners discussed the ordinance language and confirmed it aligns with prior practice.

The ordinance text cited statutory references in the record as "care s 23 8 2 20, 24 8 1 1 8 5, and 64 1 0 9 1" in the meeting reading. Staff said the ordinance would repeal conflicting earlier ordinance language to the extent of the conflict.

Ending: The board’s discussion indicates staff will follow the auditor—s recommendation to renew the fee ordinance; the transcript excerpt did not record a final, named vote in the provided portion of the meeting.