Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Property Tax Appeals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board settles multiple property tax appeals; several reappraisals approved, some cases tabled
Summary
The consolidated Board of Equalization reviewed scores of appeals and property corrections. The assessor’s office recommendations were approved in multiple cases, some appeals were tabled for more information, and the board approved several exemptions and administrative changes.
The Clay County Board of County Commissioners, sitting as the consolidated Board of Equalization, acted on a slate of property tax appeals, corrections and exemptions on Monday.
Linnea Olson, the county director of equalization, presented most appeals and valuation recommendations. Several property owners either attended or submitted written appeals; the board approved the assessor’s recommendations in multiple cases, tabled others for follow-up inspections or additional documentation, and approved routine exemptions and program adjustments.
Key actions at the consolidated Board of Equalization included:
• James Neal (937 Rice Drive): Board voted to table the appeal and directed staff to obtain more documentation and attempt contact with the owner; motion to table passed by voice vote.
• Bill and Sheryl Brown (PT 17): Assessor recommended lowering the assessed value for the property to $225,755 based on on-site review and comparables; the board approved the assessor’s recommendation by voice vote.
• Keith and Tammy Mosler: Staff corrected interior square footage and recommended a reduced assessed value; the board approved the correction.
• Verbillion LLC / Darren Seiden (305 & 313 Prentice): Owner submitted an income-capitalization argument. The assessor used a hybrid approach (income for buildings; cost for land/paving) and recommended a lower overall valuation to bring assessed value closer to comparable sales; the board approved the assessor’s recommendation.
• Hy-Vee: The company submitted an income-based appeal. The assessor’s staff requested audited income information that the county did not receive; after discussion the board voted to leave the original assessed value unchanged.
• ACE Hardware / 812 Cottage (addition): The owner asked that a recent addition be assessed at the same per-square-foot rate as the existing building; the board tabled the appeal and requested additional market and permit information before deciding.
• A range of residential corrections and reappraisals were approved after on-site reviews, including adjustments recommended for Deb Maze, Mark Mazur, Collie Phosfet and others; motions to accept the assessor’s recommendations passed on voice or roll-call votes where noted in the record.
• County-level appeals and administrative items: The board considered a local-board decision on a small-acreage rural parcel (Cody Lovejoy) and voted to accept the assessor’s recommendation and override the township decision to lower the parcel, restoring the higher assessed value on the county record.
• Exemptions and relief programs: The board approved elderly-freeze and veterans exemptions as presented; it also approved four tax-exempt status applications (Boys and Girls Club; Goodwill Great Plains; Sezdek; and the Southeast South Dakota Experiment Farm) and instructed staff to apply the changes to tax records.
The board repeatedly distinguished between “discussion only,” staff direction to gather more information, and formal action. Several appeals were continued so staff could complete walkthroughs or receive missing documentation before a final determination.
Because many appeals involved technical appraisal matters — square footage corrections, functional obsolescence, income-capitalization calculations and effective ages — commissioners repeatedly deferred to the assessor’s office for valuation methodology. The board’s rulings were almost entirely procedural or valuation decisions; no new countywide tax policy or rate changes were proposed at the hearing.
Votes at a glance (selected cases from the transcript):
- James Neal (937 Rice Drive): Motion to table until next meeting — approved (voice vote). - Bill & Sheryl Brown (PT 17): Assessor recommendation to set assessed value to $225,755 — approved (voice vote). - Keith & Tammy Mosler: Assessor corrections accepted — approved (voice vote). - Darren Seiden / Verbillion LLC (multi-unit apartments, Prentice & Clark): Assessor recommended lowering valuation using income approach for buildings and cost for land; board approved assessor recommendation — approved (voice vote). - Hy-Vee (large retail): County assessor recommended keeping current assessed value after requested income documentation was not provided — motion to leave assessed value as originally set — approved (voice vote). - ACE Hardware (812 Cottage) addition: Motion to table pending permit and market information — approved (voice vote). - Multiple residential corrections (Deb Maze, Mark Mazur, Collie Phosfet, others): Assessor recommendations to adjust assessed values after inspections — approved (voice votes as recorded). - County actions: Cody Lovejoy (small acreage): County board accepted assessor’s recommendation, overturning local township reduction — approved (voice vote). - Exemptions: Elderly freeze and veterans-exemption updates, and four tax-exempt organizational applications — approved.
The board often requested follow-up by assessor staff when owners did not supply supporting documentation, or when a walkthrough was needed to verify interior condition or square footage. Where calculations or market indicators were incomplete, the board generally tabled the appeal to allow staff to gather the missing material.
Because appeals are highly fact-specific, taxpayers who have pending appeals and those whose cases were tabled were advised in the meeting to contact the assessor’s office to schedule inspections and to provide documentation such as audited income, contractor permits, or repair invoices.
