Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Affordability topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Nevada bill would let Tahoe counties charge linkage fees to fund deed-restricted housing
Summary
A hearing on Senate Bill 99 focused on allowing Washoe and Douglas counties to impose linkage fees in the Lake Tahoe Basin to offset utility and mitigation costs for deed‑restricted affordable housing; proponents called it one tool among many and opponents warned fees could raise housing costs.
Senate Bill 99 would authorize local jurisdictions in the Lake Tahoe Basin to charge linkage fees on certain market‑rate residential development and use that revenue to offset utility hookups and mitigation fees for deed‑restricted affordable housing projects.
Supporters told the Assembly Committee on Government Affairs that the bill is limited to the portion of Washoe and Douglas counties inside the Tahoe Basin and is intended to provide one additional financing tool to address the region’s housing shortage and related commuter impacts.
The bill’s proponents said Tahoe faces an acute workforce‑housing shortage, driven by a high share of second homes and constrained developable land. “Half of Tahoe’s existing homes are second homes used seasonally,” Devin Middlebrook, government affairs manager for the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, told the committee. He cited a 2024 median home price of $980,000 for the Tahoe region and said three recent needs assessments identify a regional need of more than 5,800 units, including just over 1,200 units in Washoe County by 2026. Middlebrook said SB 99 would be enabling legislation limited to the Basin and would require a county nexus study before any fee could be imposed.
Proponents emphasized limits in the draft: the authorization would apply only within the Lake Tahoe Basin; fees would be set by the counties, not by TRPA; and revenue would be restricted to offsetting costs such as utility hookups and other impact fees for deed‑restricted units. Cadence Matejevich, representing Washoe County, told the panel the county supports the bill as a targeted tool for Incline Village and Crystal Bay.
Opponents said linkage fees risk increasing the price of new construction and that the primary way to improve affordability is to increase supply and reduce regulatory barriers. Dan Morgan, CEO of the Builders Association of Northern Nevada, told the committee, “Adding costs to new home construction will not solve affordability issues. It will only exacerbate them.” Azim Jessa, legislative chair for the Nevada Realtors, raised practical concerns about how the fee would apply to high‑cost repairs or remodels that exceed the bill’s monetary thresholds.
Committee members pressed for details on scale and limits. Assemblymember DeLong asked whether the legislation could address the magnitude of the workforce commuting into the Basin; Middlebrook said the fee is not intended to satisfy the entire regional need but to be one layer among many tools, pointing to TRPA actions such as permitting ADUs and motel‑to‑housing conversions. Middlebrook told members the draft already contemplates exemptions and that counties must complete a nexus study to establish proportionality and exemptions before enacting any fee.
The hearing included oral support from Washoe County and opposition from local development and real‑estate trade groups. No vote was taken during the hearing; sponsors said counties would control implementation details including how to treat emergency repairs and renovations.
If enacted, SB 99 would require counties in the Nevada portion of the Lake Tahoe Basin to complete a nexus study before adopting a linkage fee and would limit the eligible uses of fee revenue to defined mitigation and utility hookup costs for deed‑restricted units. Sponsors urged the committee to view the bill as a narrowly targeted, enabling tool rather than a comprehensive housing solution.
