Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Voter Registration topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bill would align absentee registration with in-person citizenship documentation; opponents warn of access barriers
Summary
Representative Bob Lynn introduced HB 217 to require the same proof of citizenship for absentee registrants that in-person registrants provide; supporters said it clarifies law, opponents warned of burdens on seniors, disabled and people who changed names, and the committee took public testimony with no final vote recorded.
Representative Robert (Bob) Lynn of Windham told the committee House Bill 217 is intended to make absentee voter registration consistent with House Bill 1569 by requiring documentation of citizenship, identity, age and domicile when applying for absentee ballots.
Lynn said confusion surfaced among town clerks about whether absentee applicants must provide the same documentation. He said some clerks had interpreted the absentee statute as not requiring proof of citizenship and introduced HB 217 to clarify that the same ‘‘acid test’’ (age, identity, domicile, citizenship) applies whether registering in-person or via absentee ballot.
Supporters argued the change would reduce the risk of ineligible registrants and strengthen public confidence. Opponents, including Representative Connie Lane and the New Hampshire Municipal Association, said there is no presented evidence of widespread noncitizen voting, and they raised practical concerns about logistics and equity: the time and cost to obtain birth certificates or marriage records, difficulties for adoptees or people whose birth records are not easily located, the disproportionate burden on women who have changed names, seniors, low-income people and those with disabilities.
Representatives of municipal clerks and the NHMA told the committee many local clerks already perform periodic checks against postal and death records and that mandating annual or more stringent documentation could create substantial workload and cost burdens for small offices and volunteer supervisors of the checklist.
Committee members asked for data and for clarity on how proof would be transmitted or secured if mailed; Lynn said the bill does not add new security requirements beyond existing law and that a passport or birth certificate is not hard to obtain in most cases, though opponents disputed that characterization. Several senators said they had no data demonstrating a problem and asked committee staff to assess implementation issues. The committee took testimony and closed the public hearing; there was no committee final vote recorded during the session.
The online hearing record captured nine supporters and 225 opposed. Committee members noted suggestions about alternative approaches — using DMV or vital records data, state-funded document access for people who lack them, or delaying further changes until pending litigation over HB1569 is resolved — and asked staff to weigh those implementation concerns if the bill proceeds.
