Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Equity Policy Resolution topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Stoughton board amends and adopts resolution affirming support for all students; adds students with disabilities
Summary
The Stoughton Area School District Board of Education amended and adopted a resolution titled Supporting and Including All Students to explicitly include students with disabilities after a motion to amend was proposed by Lisa Pugh and accepted by the board.
Get email alerts on the Equity Policy Resolution topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Stoughton Area School District Board of Education voted to amend and adopt a resolution reaffirming its support for all students and to explicitly include students with disabilities in the groups named in the resolution.
A board member moved to approve the resolution as presented; the motion was seconded. During discussion, board member Lisa Pugh said she wanted to add language explicitly referencing students with disabilities and abilities, noting that students with disabilities may be affected by changes at the federal level and by shifts in available grants and programs. Pugh proposed amending the resolution to insert references to students with disabilities alongside other groups such as students of color and LGBTQ+ students.
Pugh moved the amendment; Joe Frey seconded it. Board member Tim Buban accepted the amendment. The board then voted to adopt the amendment by voice vote. The board subsequently voted to approve the amended resolution; the chair announced the motion was adopted and the resolution was adopted. No opposition or abstentions were recorded on the voice votes as announced at the meeting.
The amended resolution will be included in the district record; no resolution number was specified during the meeting. The amendment discussion occurred during the meeting’s discussion/action agenda item and reflected members’ intent to make the resolution explicitly inclusive of students with disabilities.
The board took no additional formal actions tied to implementation at the meeting; members discussed placement of the disability language within the resolution and deferred any legal citation additions to staff or counsel.

