Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Energy Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Developer seeks extension of special exception for New Market solar project; board schedules process discussion
Summary
Sun Energy 1’s representative asked the board to schedule a hearing on an extension of the special exception for the New Market solar project, citing interconnection delays at PJM and Delmarva; staff confirmed the applicant filed before the expiration and the board discussed a July hearing date and notice requirements.
A representative for Sun Energy 1 asked the Dorchester County Board of Zoning Appeals to set a date to consider an extension of the special exception for the New Market solar project, saying delays in interconnection studies and utility upgrades have prevented construction from starting.
Ryan Schoebelter, speaking for the project developer, said the project received a special exception and final site-plan approval in 2023 and a certificate of public convenience and necessity (CPCN) from the Maryland Public Service Commission, but that PJM interconnection studies and Delmarva Power’s backlog have delayed the start of construction. “One of the most challenging aspects of the development of solar is dealing with the utility providers on what’s called interconnection,” Schoebelter said.
Schoebelter told the board his extension request was submitted before the special-exception expiration and that state CPCN deadlines and local time frames differ; he asked the board to set a hearing date so notices could go to adjoining owners and prior participants. County staff and members discussed scheduling and agreed an extension request filed prior to expiration is timely under the code; staff advised a hearing, with mailed notice to adjoining owners and prior participants, would give those who testified previously an opportunity to request an oral argument.
Board and staff suggested flexibility on dates; the board staff offered July 24 at 10 a.m. as a potential hearing slot if the agenda allows. Schoebelter said he could provide lists of addresses for notice and a draft form letter for staff review.
The exchange emphasized two points for the record: (1) the developer reported the delay stems from PJM interconnection and Delmarva upgrade backlogs, and (2) the county’s code permits parties who received notice of the prior proceeding to request oral argument on an extension request. No decision to extend was made at the meeting; the board agreed to set a hearing date and for staff to manage notice and hearing logistics.
