Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Right Of Way Abandonment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission recommends approval of Monitor Peak Street abandonment with edits requiring easements and water-main removal bonding
Summary
The commission voted to recommend that the Board of Supervisors approve the partial abandonment of Monitor Peak Street (approximately 5,347 sq ft), with modified conditions that acknowledge submitted documentation, allow bonding in lieu of immediate water-main removal, and require easements as determined by the city engineer.
Get email alerts on the Right Of Way Abandonment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Carson City Planning Commission on April 30 recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve an abandonment of approximately 5,347 square feet of Monitor Peak Street — the easterly 105 linear feet at the street’s terminus — and to incorporate that strip into two adjacent residential lots, subject to clarified conditions about utilities and easements.
Planner Heather Manzo explained the request applies to a paper street segment that no longer provides a public connection because subdivision changes and grade shifts eliminated the planned connection; the area was dedicated with the final map but has no functional right of way. Staff recommended approval after finding the public would not be materially injured by the abandonment. The staff report also identified an existing water line within the abandonment area and recommended the line be removed prior to recording the abandonment or otherwise addressed.
Applicant representative Justin Moore, a professional land surveyor, said the application package already included title reports, recorded plats and other documentation required by staff. Moore argued that several of staff’s conditions were redundant or premature because the applicant had already reserved easements and intended to address utilities and lot-line adjustments by subsequent administrative filings. Engineering staff and the city’s development engineer (Steven Pote) explained the city’s interest in removing or bonding for the water main to avoid having a live utility on private property. After discussion staff agreed to revised language that would accept submitted documents in lieu of duplicate submittals, allow the applicant to post a bond in place of immediate water-main removal, and require that the abandonment documents reflect any easements deemed necessary by the city engineer prior to recordation.
The applicant accepted those modifications; commissioners voted to recommend approval to the Board of Supervisors with the three stated edits. One commissioner recorded a dissenting vote in public comment, citing concerns that the file was not sufficiently tidy for transmittal. The motion recorded the agreed changes: (1) acknowledge that required documentation had already been provided, (2) permit bonding in lieu of immediate physical removal of the water main, and (3) require the applicant to include any easements required by the city engineer prior to recordation.
Technical and process notes in the hearing: the abandonment is allowed to be recorded within one year of approval; the applicant intends to follow the abandonment with a lot-line adjustment to reconfigure the two lots and reposition easements, but staff explained lot-line adjustments are processed separately and cannot be approved prior to the abandonment being recorded. The city’s development engineer noted the water line is presently live and that leaving utility mains on private property can require long-term city maintenance and contamination-mitigation actions if left in place; the applicant reported the utility removal is permitted and bonded and that crews are scheduled to remove the main as part of proximate Phase 2 work.
