Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Alcohol Regulation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bill would let Nevada ‘estate’ distilleries bottle and store third‑party spirits, supporters say it protects brand
Summary
Supporters of Senate Bill 439 told the Assembly Commerce and Labor Committee that allowing estate distilleries to store and bottle third‑party bulk spirits would generate revenue for small distilleries without diminishing the designation of estate distilled products.
Chair Marzola opened the hearing on Senate Bill 439, which would amend Nevada law governing alcoholic beverages to allow estate distilleries to receive, store and bottle third‑party bulk or neutral spirits if those products are segregated and clearly labeled.
The bill’s sponsors and industry representatives said the change is intended to help small distilleries use existing equipment to generate revenue while preserving the integrity of estate‑distilled products. “We have the systems in place to ensure third party spirits are properly and strictly segregated to ensure there is no crossover into our estate distilled products,” Mary Tran, deputy general counsel for Foley Family Wines and Spirits, told the committee.
Minden Mill Distilling’s master distiller, Joseph O’Sullivan, described the operational safeguards the distillery uses and the business rationale for the bill. He said building a spirits brand often takes multiple years and that using bottling lines and rick houses for third‑party work would help the distillery retain facilities and staff while its own brands mature. “This is purely for us to allow for revenue to be generated by using the equipment that we already have,” O’Sullivan said.
Outside counsel Leif Reid summarized the bill’s text for the committee: it would (1) allow craft distilleries to sell other types of beer, wine or liquor in the same manner wineries may under current statutory language, so long as the products are appropriately licensed locally; and (2) permit estate distilleries to receive neutral or distilled spirits for storage provided those barrels and bottles are marked and completely segregated from estate operations.
The committee received limited public testimony. Wiz Rousard, deputy state director for Americans for Prosperity, called the bill pro‑small business and urged support. Frey Ranch Estate Distillery’s outside representative, Matt Robinson of Argen & Partners, testified neutral, asking that any expansion be applied uniformly to all distilleries in the state.
No committee member moved to amend the bill during today’s hearing and no formal vote was taken; the chair closed the hearing and moved to the next item on the agenda.
Why it matters: supporters said the bill would help small, high‑cost producers make productive use of capital‑intensive equipment while retaining the “estate” label for products fully produced on site. Opponents did not appear in opposition at today’s hearing, though one neutral party requested parity for craft distilleries across Nevada.
