Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Fleet topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Audit committee probes motor‑pool replacement program, depreciation and leasing strategy
Summary
Staff explained the city's fleet replacement approach, depreciation accounting changes over the past five to six years and a lease/rotate program that yields new vehicles under warranty more often.
Get email alerts on the Fleet topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
North Ogden staff described how the city acquires, depreciates and replaces fleet vehicles and why recent accounting changes have increased visible motor‑pool balances in the budget.
David (staff member) told the audit committee the city had for years recorded depreciation but did not always set the cash aside. After a change of audit firm, the city began setting aside depreciation properly about five to six years ago. Members asked whether that reserve now covers upcoming vehicle purchases, and staff said the reserve is accumulating but will not fully cover higher current vehicle prices for like‑for‑like replacements.
Committee members also discussed the fleet procurement strategy. Staff explained a lease/rotate model: the city acquires state‑contract vehicles and typically keeps them about a year (low mileage), then sells them at auction and buys a new vehicle under current state incentives. According to staff, that practice preserves warranty coverage, reduces long‑term maintenance costs and in many cases returns the vehicle resale value near the purchase price after one year, lowering net capital outlay.
The committee asked for clearer depreciation schedules and a reconciliation showing how much depreciation cash is currently set aside and how that lines up against planned vehicle purchases (for example, snowplow trucks and other capital equipment). David said he would provide a breakdown of the motor‑pool accounting lines and confirm totals where the printed yellow sheets show apparent decreases that staff say are in fact increases once pass‑throughs and admin transfers are reconciled.
Committee members discussed options including continued use of leases for heavy equipment, coordination with neighboring jurisdictions for procurement, and investigating seized‑vehicle programs used by some state agencies to obtain unmarked vehicles. No formal action was taken.

