Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Community Survey Wellbeing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah Well-being Project: Emigration Canyon ranks high; residents flag noise, traffic and bike infrastructure
Summary
Utah State University's Well-being Project presented results from a resident survey showing high overall well-being in Emigration Canyon but concerns about noise (motorcycles), road maintenance and lack of bike lanes and trails.
A Utah State University researcher presented a community well-being survey that showed Emigration Canyon respondents reported among the highest levels of personal and community well-being compared with other participating Utah towns, but also raised concerns about noise, traffic and cycling infrastructure.
Courtney Flint, director of the Utah Well-being Project, reviewed results from 45 local respondents (about 11.7% response rate). "The well-being project really, defines well-being as everything that makes up a good life," Flint said, explaining the broad survey approach. The canyon averaged 4.42 on a five-point personal well-being scale and ranked near the top among 51 participating jurisdictions.
Survey results highlighted strong scores for living standards, safety and connection to nature. Areas with comparatively lower relative ratings included education, social connections, transportation and cultural opportunities. Environmental issues topped residents' concern lists: water supply and quality, climate change, air quality and open space were cited most often. Motor‑vehicle and motorcycle noise, and the adequacy of bike lanes and paths, also appeared repeatedly in open-ended comments.
Flint said respondents who attended community events reported higher levels of community connection. The research team noted demographic patterns: longer-term residents and males reported higher connection scores; the sample underrepresented residents without a college degree.
Ending — Flint said the project hopes to fund another survey in 2026 and noted the value of repeated surveys to create a multi-year baseline. Council members discussed whether to budget a modest contribution to continue the project and use the data for planning and outreach.
