Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Unlawful Occupancy Squatting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bill would expand unlawful-occupancy and housebreaking rules to include forged rental agreements and shorten contest windows, proponents say
Summary
Sen. Jeff Stone told the Assembly Judiciary Committee SB202 would make it a crime to use forged rental agreements to obtain occupancy and would shorten the period an unauthorized occupant has to contest a lockout from 21 days to 5 days.
Get email alerts on the Unlawful Occupancy Squatting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sen. Jeff Stone presented Senate Bill 202 to the Assembly Judiciary Committee as a measure to prevent unlawful occupancy by people who use forged or false rental agreements to take possession of houses, mobile homes or recreational vehicles.
Stone said SB202 would expand Nevada's housebreaking and unlawful-occupancy statutes to cover cases in which a person "procures or offers a false or forged written rental agreement" with the intent to occupy a dwelling or to allow another person to do so. The bill also provides statutory definitions distinguishing "squatter" and "tenant" for purposes of summary proceedings and clarifies that a squatter is not a tenant for those purposes.
The bill shortens two timelines tied to lockouts and the storage of personal property by an owner: the period for an unauthorized occupant locked out of a dwelling to contest the lockout would drop from 21 days to 5 days, and the time an owner must store the occupant's personal property would be shortened similarly. "This bill is designed to prevent unauthorized occupation of properties regardless if whether they're empty or temporarily uninhabited," Stone said.
Supporters included the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, which said the bill clarifies a frequent pattern—fraudulent listings and forged documents used to take control of vacant properties—and industry groups such as the Vegas Chamber and Nevada Realtors, which said the shorter timelines would help property owners return units to the market more quickly.
Opponents, including the Clark County and Washoe County public defenders, Nevada Coalition of Legal Service Providers and tenant-advocacy groups, urged caution. Paloma Guerrero of the Clark County Public Defender's Office said vulnerable people are often the victims of fraudulent leases and warned that shortening the contest period from 21 to 5 days risks stripping innocent tenants of adequate time to locate documentation, seek counsel, or arrange alternative housing: "No one likes squatters, but it's generally the people on the margins that get tricked," she said. Washoe public defender Angela Knott raised similar concerns about the short timeline for people who may not know a lease is invalid and who could lose their belongings on a five-day clock.
Several witnesses suggested system-level changes to reduce fraud, including a searchable landlord registry or clearer public records to let tenants verify who is authorized to rent a property before moving in.
The committee did not take a vote at the hearing. Sponsor and supporters said they are open to working with opposition groups on language and implementation details before any work-session action.

