Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Affordability topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission approves Bluenest at Chrome workforce-housing project with conditions after large public turnout
Summary
The Miami-Dade County Board of County Commissioners voted unanimously to transmit and forward for review the Bluenest at Chrome comprehensive development master plan (CDMP) application, approving conditions that cap townhome prices at the workforce level, preserve 20% of units for households meeting workforce income limits, require a pump station sized for the basin, and emphasize green infrastructure for stormwater.
Get email alerts on the Housing Affordability topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Miami-Dade County Board of County Commissioners voted unanimously to transmit and forward for state review the Bluenest at Chrome application, a 90-acre mixed residential project in southern Miami‑Dade that the developer says will include up to 700 homes and a neighborhood retail node.
The commission approved the item after extensive public comment and a presentation from the applicant. The board added three conditions: cap all townhomes at the project’s workforce-housing sales price; keep 20% of units restricted to workforce income limits; and require the applicant to construct a pump station sized to serve the basin rather than a private pump station. The board also requested use of green‑infrastructure landscaping to help manage stormwater runoff.
Why it matters: Commissioners and residents framed the vote as a test of regional housing policy, land-use compatibility in the Redlands agricultural fringe and infrastructure planning for an area currently served by septic systems. Supporters said the project will deliver homeownership opportunities for local workers; opponents said the density and design are out of character with surrounding agricultural and single-family areas.
What the board approved and why Pedro Gaston, speaking for Bluenest Development, said the proposal “is about providing workforce housing homeownership.” He told the commission the developer will offer a sales product the applicant described as attainable for many buyers, saying, “with a $4,500 deposit and $2,600 per month, you can own a home.” The applicant also committed to 20% of the units meeting workforce income limits and said the maximum sales price for workforce units would be capped at about $451,000.
Commissioner Cohen Higgins (district designation stated on the record) moved the application “consistent with staff’s recommendation”; Commissioner Gilbert seconded the motion. Commissioners across the dais praised the developer’s outreach, the project’s mix of housing types, and the applicant’s commitment to sewer connections and neighborhood retail. Vice Chairman McGee and Chairman Rodriguez joined a unanimous roll call.
Public response and concerns More than 50 people signed up to speak. Speakers were sharply divided. Supporters — including teachers, young workers, veterans and first‑time homebuyers — said the project offers scarce ownership opportunities at price points they said are otherwise unavailable in Miami‑Dade.
Opponents in the room characterized the project as incompatible with the Redlands’ agricultural character and raised infrastructure concerns. Natalie Grant, a lifelong South Miami‑Dade resident, said she feared the scale of the development would “completely transform for the negative the area that surrounds us,” and criticized the developer’s community engagement. Mary Waters, a Redlands resident, urged denial and said the area is known for agriculture, not townhomes.
Several commissioners pressed the applicant on infrastructure. Commissioner Regalado asked whether the pump station and stormwater plans would be sized for the wider basin rather than only the site; the applicant and staff said the project will provide a public pump station and has discussed drainage plans with county drainage staff. At the board’s request the applicant agreed to additional landscaping that emphasizes trees and green infrastructure to reduce runoff.
Key commitments from the applicant - 700-unit maximum overall with a 20% workforce‑restricted requirement (140 units). - All townhomes will be capped at the developer’s workforce housing sales price; the board’s action also preserves 20% of the overall units with income-based workforce limits. - Connection to public water and sewer; the applicant committed to build sanitary sewer infrastructure and to construct a pump station intended to serve the basin. - A commercial node at the northwest corner to provide neighborhood‑serving retail; applicant materials said the site is in a USDA-designated low‑access area and the commercial node would reduce travel for groceries. - Applicant asserted the development would yield approximately $12.2 million in impact fees and tax revenues during buildout.
Votes at a glance (other zoning/CDMP outcomes taken during the same meeting) - CDMP small-scale application for Lennar Holmes LLC (CDMP202326) with concurrent zoning (8C2 / Z2023000447): APPROVED, unanimous. Applicant Hugo Arza represented the application; district commissioner moved adoption consistent with staff’s recommendation. (See action list below.)
- CDMP mitigation bank application (EIP for Florida Round Hammock Land Company LLC, item 7A): ADOPTED, unanimous. Staff and the applicant agreed to a declaration of restrictions; public commenters urged careful coordination with Everglades restoration and hydrology.
- Infinity Gardens Apartments (CDMP20230010 / Z2023000187, items 7B / 8C1): ADOPTED/APPROVED, unanimous. This parcel straddled the urban development boundary and the commission approved the transmittal/rezoning after the district commissioner spoke in support.
- Douglas Road Metropolitan Urban Center text amendment (CDMP20240004, item 7C): ADOPTED as transmitted, unanimous. This was a department-initiated amendment to the urban center text of the comprehensive plan.
- Fourteenth Street RTZ application (8C3 / Z2024000125): CONTINUED/DEFERRED to the next scheduled BCC zoning meeting after a commissioner asked for more time to review the public‑benefit proffer; applicant and ownership agreed to a short delay.
- Marquis Health skilled-nursing facility (8C4 / Z2024000128): APPROVED with conditions, unanimous. The commission approved an unusual-use application and associated variances but added an explicit condition that the property be limited to a skilled‑nursing facility in which the majority of patients will be over age 62.
- Extra Space self‑storage (8C5 / Z2024000131): APPROVED with proffered covenant, unanimous. County traffic and planning staff reviewed the traffic analysis and supported the item; the applicant proffered a covenant for public benefits.
What to watch next - The Bluenest application will proceed through the State Land Planning Agency review and back to the county for subsequent entitlements (site plan and permitting). The applicant’s sewer, pump station, and stormwater permitting will need additional technical approvals.
- The board’s commitment to require a pump station sized for the basin and the landscaping condition mean that downstream neighbors and county drainage staff will be engaged in the technical permitting phase.
Speakers (attributed in this article) - Pedro Gaston — Applicant representative, Bluenest Development (business). First referenced on the record as counsel/representative for the applicant. - Celine Scribe — Bluenest Development principal (business). Present on the applicant team. - Camille Treiby — Bluenest Development principal (business). Present on the applicant team. - Miskayo Sittuth — Applicant team (business). Present at the hearing. - Alessandro Saint Romain — Applicant team (business). Present at the hearing. - Commissioner Cohen Higgins — Commissioner, Miami‑Dade County (government). District commissioner who moved the item. - Commissioner Gilbert — Commissioner, Miami‑Dade County (government). Seconded the motion. - Commissioner Regalado — Commissioner, Miami‑Dade County (government). - Vice Chairman McGee — Vice Chairman, Miami‑Dade County Board of County Commissioners (government). - Chairman Rodriguez — Chairman, Miami‑Dade County Board of County Commissioners (government). - Commissioner Steinberg; Commissioner Bastian; Commissioner Bermudez; Commissioner Gonzales; Commissioner Hardeman; Senator Garcia — Commissioners present during discussion and roll call (government). - Natalie Grant — Resident, South Miami‑Dade (citizen). Public commenter opposed. - Mary Waters — Resident, Redlands (citizen). Public commenter opposed. - Vanessa McDonough — Resident, Redlands (citizen). Public commenter opposed. - Multiple residents, teachers and prospective buyers — Residents who testified in favor (citizen).
Authorities referenced - CDMP application: CDMP2024(15) / referenced as CDMP 2024 15 (Bluenest at Chrome 1 LLC) — ordinance/resolution transmittal and first-reading titles were read into the record. - Zoning application references for the concurrent zoning items were read into the record (Z application numbers as posted on the agenda).
Actions (formal motions taken at the meeting) - Kind: resolution / transmittal plus ordinance first reading (Bluenest at Chrome) - identifiers: {"agenda_item_id":"4A/4A1 (supplement)","project_slug":"bluenest-chrome"} - motion: "Move to transmit/adopt 4A and 4A1 consistent with staff recommendation with the following additional conditions: (1) cap all townhomes at the workforce housing sales price; (2) maintain 20% of units with workforce income restrictions; (3) provide a pump station sized to accommodate the basin as a whole; (4) incorporate landscaping and green infrastructure to aid stormwater management." - mover: "Commissioner Cohen Higgins" - second: "Commissioner Gilbert" - vote_record: [ {"member":"Commissioner Cohen Higgins","vote":"yes"}, {"member":"Commissioner Gilbert","vote":"yes"}, {"member":"Commissioner Regalado","vote":"yes"}, {"member":"Commissioner Steinberg","vote":"yes"}, {"member":"Commissioner Bastian","vote":"yes"}, {"member":"Commissioner Bermudez","vote":"yes"}, {"member":"Commissioner Gonzales","vote":"yes"}, {"member":"Commissioner Hardeman","vote":"yes"}, {"member":"Senator Garcia","vote":"yes"}, {"member":"Vice Chairman McGee","vote":"yes"}, {"member":"Chairman Rodriguez","vote":"yes"} ] - tally: {"yes":11,"no":0,"abstain":0} - outcome: "approved" - notes: "Applicant agreed to cap townhome prices and to install a pump station sized for the basin; applicant also committed to connect to water/sewer and provide neighborhood retail."
- Other actions recorded in this meeting (summary entries) - Lennar Holmes LLC CDMP202326 with concurrent zoning (item 3A / 8C2): motion moved by district commissioner (name per record), seconded by Commissioner Gilbert; roll call unanimous; outcome: approved (final action on small-scale CDMP and concurrent zoning). - EIP for Florida Round Hammock Land Co. (item 7A): motion to adopt acceptance of declaration of restrictions consistent with staff recommendation; vote: unanimous; outcome: adopted. - Infinity Gardens Apartments (CDMP20230010 / Z2023000187) (items 7B / 8C1): motion moved and seconded; vote unanimous; outcome: adopted/approved. - Douglas Road Metropolitan Urban Center text amendment (CDMP20240004) (item 7C): adopted as transmitted; vote unanimous. - Fourteenth Street RTZ (8C3 / Z2024000125): motion to defer to next scheduled BCC zoning meeting; motion passed; outcome: deferred. - Marquis Health skilled-nursing facility (8C4 / Z2024000128): approved with conditions including a requirement that the use be a skilled-nursing facility with majority of residents over age 62; vote unanimous. - Extra Space self-storage (8C5 / Z2024000131): approved with proffered covenant and recommendation from staff; vote unanimous.
Clarifying details extracted from the record - Project site size: about 90 acres (applicant and public comments repeatedly referred to a 90‑acre site). - Maximum unit count (applicant commitment): up to 700 units; workforce-restricted units: 20% (140 units). - Applicant-stated workforce sales price cap: maximum workforce unit price cited at $451,000; workforce entry example given by applicant: $4,500 down and $2,600 per month. - Expected impact fees/tax revenue cited by applicant: approximately $12,200,000 (applicant figure provided during presentation).
Community relevance - Geographies: South Miami‑Dade / Redlands, near SW 272 Street, SW 177 Chrome Avenue and SW 172 Avenue (addresses read into the record). - Impact groups: workforce households, teachers, first‑time homebuyers, seniors, long‑term Redlands residents.
Meeting context - Engagement level: high public turnout for this item (more than 50 registered speakers and numerous supporters waving in the chamber); discussion on the dais lasted over an hour. - Implementation risk: medium — development depends on subsequent technical approvals for sewer, pump station, stormwater, and state transmittal review. - History: application was transmitted in the October 2024 cycle and had PAB and staff recommendations discussed at the hearing.
Searchable tags:["Bluenest","workforce housing","CDMP","zoning","Redlands","Miami-Dade"]
salience:{"overall":0.86,"overall_justification":"Large local impact on housing supply and infrastructure with unanimous board action and significant public turnout.","impact_scope":"local","impact_scope_justification":"Directly affects South Miami‑Dade neighborhoods and county infrastructure.","attention_level":"high","attention_level_justification":"Extensive public comment and board discussion; next steps involve multiple permitting reviews.","novelty":0.55,"novelty_justification":"Scale and combination of price‑caps and basin‑level pump station commitment are notable but follow prior workforce projects.","timeliness_urgency":0.72,"timeliness_urgency_justification":"Application now transmits to state review and will return for entitlement actions; infrastructure commitments need timely technical review.","legal_significance":0.30,"legal_significance_justification":"Standard CDMP transmittal/rezoning process; not a unique legal precedent.","budgetary_significance":0.40,"budgetary_significance_justification":"Local impact fees and revenues noted but no county capital commitment recorded in the motion."}
