Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Technical Education Cte topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Appropriations committee approves technical education bill but rejects amendment to restore private career-school participation

3115095 · April 24, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Lawmakers debated language in a Technical Education and Career System bill that removed private career schools from cooperative arrangements and added nonprofit training institutes. An amendment to reinstate private career schools failed 21–25; the base bill was advanced.

The Appropriations Committee considered a substitute for House Bill 7216, a measure implementing recommendations for the Technical Education and Career System (CTE/CTECS). Members debated a change that removed “private career schools” from a list of entities that the executive director may enter into cooperative arrangements with and replaced that phrase with “a nonprofit training institute in the state that provides training in the building trades to underserved populations.”

Representative Eckert and others raised concerns the deletion could limit opportunities for private providers who offer certifications, apprenticeships, or employer connections for CTE students. Eckert said private career schools sometimes provide certification pathways and apprenticeship hours that can lead directly to employment; she opposed the substitution as written.

Representative Ackert moved an amendment to remove brackets so that private career schools would remain included alongside nonprofit training institutes. That amendment was debated and put to a roll-call vote. The committee recorded the outcome of the amendment vote as 21 in favor, 25 opposed; the amendment failed. Several speakers, including Senator Berthel, noted the substitute language had not been heard in a public hearing prior to the committee’s change and supported restoring the private providers’ language.

After the amendment failed, the substitute bill as drafted (including the deletion of private career schools and addition of nonprofit training institute language) was reported to the floor.

What happens next: the substitute moves to the full chamber. Members and advocates who raised concerns said they would seek to address training-provider access and apprenticeship oversight during floor consideration or in follow-up technical fixes.