Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Residential Parking topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board denies waiver for front-yard parking pad proposed in University Park

3104846 · April 23, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Prince George's County Board of Appeals denied a request from Steven and Hyacinth Mooka Towns to place a parking pad in the front yard at 7106 Wells Parkway after opposition from the Town of University Park and nearby residents citing lack of uniqueness and stormwater concerns.

The Prince George's County Board of Appeals on April 23 denied a request for a waiver to allow a front-yard parking pad at 7106 Wells Parkway in University Park, rejecting testimony that the property met the standards for relief.

Steven and Hyacinth Mooka Towns sought permission for a 20-by-20 front parking pad, a rear parking pad and a 14-by-48 addition to convert the residence for use as a five-bed assisted-living-type residence. The Towns testified the front pad would serve temporary parking needs and support a five-bed congregate residence they intend to operate.

University Park officials, neighbors and the town attorney opposed the waiver. Mayor Lori Morrissey told the board “our council voted unanimously to oppose the parking pad, as it does not meet the requirements for a variance.” Town attorney Suellen Ferguson told the board that, based on the property’s size and shape, none of the ordinance criteria for relief had been met.

Neighbors raised concerns about stormwater runoff, precedent, and the effect on neighborhood character. Sam Zakari, an adjacent property owner, testified that adding surface parking “will worsen the flooding in Wells Run” and said he submitted written materials on environmental and health-waste concerns tied to operating a care facility in a residential area.

Board analysis and outcome: Chair Boulware and other members found the Towns had not shown the property was physically unique in a way that made the zoning rule unduly burdensome, and that granting the waiver would likely impair the use and enjoyment of adjacent properties. Vice Chair Johnston moved to deny the waiver; Member Stanton seconded. Roll call votes were unanimous (Chair Boulware — aye; Vice Chair Johnston — aye; Member Stanton — aye) and the motion carried 3-0.

What the denial means: The Towns’ waiver request for the front-yard parking pad was denied; staff told the applicants the office would follow up regarding next steps. The denial addressed only the parking-area-location waiver; the record shows the town’s opposition focused on that item. The applicants remain responsible for securing any other required permits or approvals for the property and for addressing the town’s concerns through applicable processes.

Notable quotes: “Our council voted unanimously to oppose the parking pad, as it does not meet the requirements for a variance,” — Lori Morrissey, Mayor of University Park. “This is just a matter of convenience, nothing more,” — Suellen Ferguson, attorney for the Town of University Park (summarizing town position).

Ending: The board closed the case after denying the waiver. Staff will advise the applicants on subsequent steps and any other permit requirements.