Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Criminal Penalties topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances bill that increases penalties for resisting arrest after debate about community risk
Summary
The Senate Judiciary Committee gave HB 265 a favorable report after testimony that the measure fills a legal gap for officers injured while effecting an arrest; supporters described newly elevated penalties for different forms of resistance, while some senators warned the changes could produce dangerous outcomes in encounters with police.
The Senate Judiciary Committee voted to give HB 265 a favorable report after a public hearing and committee discussion. The bill was presented to the committee as a response to a perceived gap in Alabama law where an individual who resists arrest and causes injury to an officer or bystander is not adequately subject to heightened criminal penalties.
A sponsor who brought the bill to the committee said the measure reclassifies resisting arrest offenses: resisting arrest generally would move from a Class B misdemeanor to a Class A misdemeanor; resisting while brandishing a weapon or when resistance causes injury to another person would be a Class D felony; and resisting while using or attempting to use a deadly weapon or when serious injury is caused would be a Class C felony.
Supporters told the committee the bill protects officers and bystanders. Several senators asked whether the measure could produce unintended consequences in split‑second encounters. Senator Singleton said she could not support the bill, calling it “a death sentence” for the people in her community if officers respond with lethal force in those situations. Senator Smitherman and Senator Figgers raised similar concerns about disparate impacts and prior cases where officers’ actions resulted in civilian deaths.
The committee held a roll-call vote at which senators recorded their positions. The clerk read votes including "Senator Alberton," "Senator Bell — Aye," "Senator Connolly — Aye," "Senator Coleman Madison — No," "Senator Elliott — Aye," "Senator Figures — No," "Senator Gavann — Aye," "Senator Singleton — No," "Senator Smitherman — No," "Senator Stutz — Aye," "Senator Weaver — Aye," and "Senator Barfoot — Aye." The chair announced the result as 8 to 4 and reported the bill favorably out of committee.
Ending: Sponsors and committee staff will draft any technical changes and the bill will move forward in the legislative process as a favorably reported item.
