Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Childcare Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission hears local concerns about DHS 5‑star changes, fast‑track accreditation and Head Start funding
Summary
Commission members heard that Oklahoma Department of Human Services’ 5‑star designations and accelerated accreditation timelines are prompting closures and stress among local child‑care providers; members were directed to consider letters supporting Head Start and related bills.
Members of the Tulsa Women’s Commission discussed recent changes to child‑care accreditation and state funding that, speakers said, are creating pressure on local providers and could reduce capacity.
Maria Palacios, director of Early Learning Works by Tulsa Educare, told commissioners that the Department of Human Services gave multiple providers five‑star ratings and then set an accreditation deadline requiring National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC) accreditation to retain five‑star status. “They have a fast track of doing that, but that requires a lot of stuff,” Palacios said. She added that the NAFCC home‑based accreditation historically took years to secure and that compressing the timeline is putting providers under strain.
Palacios and other commission members said the five‑star designation ties directly to per‑child DHS subsidy rates. If providers lose five‑star status, they may receive lower per‑child payments from DHS, panelists said, which can make some operations financially unsustainable.
Commission members also discussed national funding risks: a speaker referenced worries about proposed cuts to Head Start and urged members to track information from Community Action Project (CAP) leaders. The commission heard two House bills affecting child care — identified in the meeting as House Bill 1849 and House Bill 1847 — but no substantive bill text or votes were provided at the meeting.
Why it matters: Commissioners said loss of local child‑care seats would affect the workforce and early‑childhood development and urged members to contact state representatives. Staff offered to circulate sample letters and talking points; panelists reported that some legislators ask for mailed letters rather than emails.
What members can do - Advocacy: Commission staff said they can distribute sample letters and talking points on Head Start and child‑care funding for mailed submissions to legislators. - Monitoring: Members were asked to watch state progress on HB 1849 and HB 1847 and to report back to the commission if they have concerns or information to share.
Ending Commission staff said they would share slide materials and sample letters with members and encouraged attendance at upcoming events and testimony opportunities; no formal action or vote on the child‑care issues occurred during the meeting.
