Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Procurement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Bannock County to review single $40,840.43 bid for road striping materials and labor

3081791 · April 22, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Bannock County commissioners accepted a motion to take under review a single sealed bid of $40,840.43 from Idaho Traffic Safety for an invitation to bid on road striping materials and labor; staff said bids will be reviewed for responsiveness and bidders notified.

Bannock County commissioners voted to accept and take under review a single sealed bid of $40,840.43 for an invitation to bid on road striping materials and labor, county staff said at a public meeting.

County staff told the commissioners that one addendum had been issued for the solicitation and that no bid bonds were required. The lone bidder identified in the record was Idaho Traffic Safety, which submitted the $40,840.43 bid for the complete project.

A county staff member unsealed the bid during the meeting and read the amount aloud, noting that reading the bid amount does not confirm responsiveness and that further review would be performed to ensure the submission met all requirements. Commissioner (unnamed) moved to accept the bids submitted and take them under review; the motion carried after those present answered “Aye.”

County staff said bidders will be notified once the county completes its review of responsiveness and qualifications. The meeting record does not show a second to the motion by name, nor does it record a roll-call vote or the number of commissioners present. The record also does not specify a timeline for the review, a date for contract award, or the funding source for the project.

The commission’s action at the meeting was procedural — accepting and placing the single bid under review rather than awarding a contract. Staff indicated that additional evaluation will determine whether the bid is responsive to the solicitation’s requirements and whether it will be recommended for award.