Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Election Administration topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee advances bill to standardize signature‑curing forms and penalties for fraud

3169845 · April 29, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

SB 3 would require the Secretary of State to publish a single signature‑curing form, add a notice on vote‑by‑mail envelopes about signature matching, and impose penalties for fraud in post‑election signature‑curing efforts; the committee advanced the bill to appropriations.

The Senate Elections Committee advanced Senate Bill 3, a measure that seeks to clarify and standardize the signature‑curing process used by campaigns and registrars to address mismatched or missing signatures on mail ballots and petitions.

Committee Chair Cervantes presented the bill and said it stems from the committee’s informational hearing on signature carrying. The bill would require the Secretary of State to publish the only signature‑curing form county registrars may accept, add a reminder on vote‑by‑mail envelopes that signatures will be compared to other signatures on file, and create penalties for fraud, intimidation or bribery associated with signature‑curing assistance.

The author said the reforms aim to reduce ambiguity and increase transparency about an activity that has become a regular part of close contests. He noted the bill builds on prior legislation (Assembly Bill 63, 2023) to require more frequent updates of election results during the canvass period.

Supporters, including League of Women Voters representatives, said clarity and uniformity would reduce confusion among voters and campaigns. No speakers in opposition were recorded during the segment that produced the committee action.

A motion to pass SB 3 to the committee on appropriations was made while the committee was waiting for quorum; subsequent roll call and committee procedure placed the bill on call and later recorded as passed out of committee. The hearing record shows committee members agreed the signature‑curing process requires clearer, consistent guidance, and the author indicated willingness to work with the Secretary of State’s office on technical implementation details.

Votes at a glance SB 3 — Motion to pass as amended to the committee on appropriations: passed (final recorded tally 5–0).