Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Retirement Savings Calsavers topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
CalSavers reaches 550,000 accounts but officials warn program needs years to become self‑sustaining
Summary
CalSavers reported more than 550,000 funded saver accounts and about $1.2 billion in assets, and officials told the Senate subcommittee the program will likely need about a decade to reach financial self‑sufficiency while the mandate expands to the smallest employers.
Get email alerts on the Retirement Savings Calsavers topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
CalSavers, the state’s auto‑enroll retirement program for workers whose employers do not offer a qualified plan, has more than 550,000 funded saver accounts and about $1.2 billion in assets under management, CalSavers Executive Director David Takartz told the Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Subcommittee No. 4 on the program’s informational item.
The program, which uses payroll deductions to funnel employee contributions into Roth IRAs and includes automatic escalation of contribution rates, now has roughly 58,000 employers actively facilitating payroll deductions and an average account balance of about $2,000, Takartz said. Employers with five or more employees have been subject to the registration and facilitation requirements; starting Dec. 30 this year the mandate will extend to employers with as few as one non‑owner employee.
Why it matters: The expansion to micro‑employers could nearly triple the number of employers in the program, and lawmakers pressed CalSavers staff on readiness for the change. CalSavers’ funding model relies on a small percentage of assets under management to cover program costs; staff and analysts told the committee that assets and balances must grow substantially for the program to become self‑sustaining.
Key details and program design - Automatic payroll deduction, auto‑enrollment, and automatic 1% annual escalation up to 8% are central features designed to increase participation without placing fiduciary or direct cost burdens on employers, Takartz said. - Employers are required to register and facilitate access; noncompliant employers can be referred to the Franchise Tax Board for penalties. Initial penalties are $250 per eligible employee (rising to $500 and then becoming annual if noncompliance continues). - CalSavers currently serves mainly low‑ and middle‑income workers. Takartz said average participant salary ranges from about $32,000–$45,000 per year.
Participation and finances - Funded accounts: 550,000+; assets under management: about $1.2 billion. - Average account balance: roughly $2,000. - Participating employers actively running payroll deductions: ~58,000; nearly 150,000 employers have completed registration steps or uploaded rosters. - CalSavers receives program funding as a small percentage (0.05%) of savers’ assets; staff said the program expects to reach break‑even as assets grow toward roughly $6 billion AUM, and they projected that could occur around fiscal year 2030 under current assumptions.
Outreach and compliance challenges Committee members pressed CalSavers on outreach to micro employers, language access, and how the program will scale when the mandate covers single‑employee employers. Takartz described a multi‑pronged approach: targeted mailings using employer data from the Employment Development Department (EDD), partnerships with small business development centers, chambers of commerce, unions and community groups, multi‑language materials, and integration with payroll providers to reduce friction for tiny employers.
Takartz said CalSavers has begun an early employer incentive campaign for micro‑employers, offering small financial incentives for early compliance and pursuing deeper payroll integrations and chatbot features to reduce reliance on employer expertise. He acknowledged turnover among employees and the mobile workforce in low‑wage occupations — a factor that reduces contribution continuity — and said the team is working to improve data integration with payroll vendors.
Fiscal and programmatic questions Legislators and the Legislative Analyst’s Office asked whether the program can become self‑sustaining and whether the state should expand the mandate before resolving implementation and enforcement questions. Takartz and CalSavers staff said the program has a longer runway to sustainability than originally projected, in part because assets per account remain low while participation grows. CalSavers estimates break‑even at about $6 billion AUM and said a million savers would be one plausible milestone on the path to that AUM level.
The committee also discussed reliance on a state startup loan and whether the program’s repayment of that loan is counted in break‑even projections; CalSavers said the repayment schedule is not included in its AUM break‑even calculation and that repayment will be addressed separately.
Ending CalSavers’ presentation was informational; the subcommittee did not take a vote on new funding. Members said they want more granular outreach and enrollment data, and some expressed concern about moving to the smallest micro‑employers before certain operational kinks are fully resolved. Takartz said CalSavers is increasing employer integration options and launching targeted incentives intended to ease the next phase of the mandate.
