Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use Planning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council approves Stonegate and Lomas Negras plan amendments to allow mixed‑use, multifamily and a regional park

3124616 · April 24, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The council approved R‑43 and R‑44 (amendments to the Lomas Negras specific area plan and Stonegate master plan) and O‑12 (a zone map amendment), clearing the way for mixed‑use and multifamily development, and confirming that smaller parks will be HOA‑maintained while a larger regional park will be dedicated to the city.

The governing body voted to approve a package of land‑use changes affecting the Stonegate area, including amendments to the Lomas Negras specific area plan and the Stonegate master plan and an associated zone map amendment.

Amy Rincon, director of development services, presented the three items together and said they were reviewed and recommended for approval by the Planning & Zoning Board on March 25. The changes reconfigure allowable uses within the Stonegate Village area to include townhomes, multifamily apartments and commercial space and rezoned parcels to permit higher-density residential and mixed‑use development.

Charlene Johnson of Consensus Planning, agent for Cold Bank Holdings (the property owner and applicant), and engineer Justin Simonson answered council questions about phasing and infrastructure. Simonson said the large park area includes a regional stormwater pond with design work nearing submission; the pond/park is tied to phase 3 and the applicant planned to submit park drawings to the city’s parks department in the coming month.

Councilors asked about who will maintain the parks. The applicant and engineer said smaller neighborhood parks and village greens will be maintained by homeowners associations, while the larger regional park will be dedicated to and maintained by the city. Simonson described the deeper portion of the pond as fenced and Skafka‑maintained (as presented), and said the regional pond is being reviewed to ensure capacity for the original design.

R‑43, R‑44 and O‑12 were approved on council votes following the staff presentation and applicant responses.