Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Housing ADU topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission grants concept review and requests revisions for three-story accessory dwelling at 712 San Pascual Street

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Historic Landmarks Commission reviewed a concept design for a three-story detached accessory structure at 712 San Pascual Street (two new units over two-car garages), issued detailed design and site comments, and voted to continue the item to Phase 2 review (HSSR/phase 2) with the requested revisions.

The Santa Barbara Historic Landmarks Commission reviewed a concept submittal on April 23 for a three-story detached accessory structure proposed at 712 San Pascual Street and directed the applicant to address design, massing and detailing before returning for Phase 2 review.

Architect Brooke Van Dine of Sherry & Associates presented the concept, saying the proposal would demolish an existing non-contributing one-car garage and construct a new detached accessory structure containing two 1-bedroom units above two two-car garages. "We are proposing to demolish that garage and construct a new accessory structure," Van Dine said, and described materials and dimensions including a proposed 6- to 8-inch horizontal composite siding, window treatments intended to read as single-hung with casement operation, corbel bracing and a light color palette.

Commission discussion covered scale and neighborhood context, garage-door treatments, stair access, private open-yard requirements, landscape screening at property lines and the potential to convert a garage to an accessory dwelling unit in the future. Commissioners requested clearer site context drawings (adjacent buildings and street improvements), shadow/sun studies for neighbor impacts, and a simplified gable/eave treatment to avoid false gables that read as unintended massing. They also asked the applicant to study the following in the next submittal: thicker porch/support posts (6x6 suggested), beefier corbel/bracket details, fewer or simplified garage-door lights and panel divisions, a possible belly band to break the elevation, and a revised stair run (add one tread) to reduce the steepness.

The commission also asked that the applicant show the proposed landscape and trash/bike parking locations and confirm long-term bicycle parking and maneuvering clearances for the alley access. Van Dine said the project would include a landscape plan when it returns and noted that two of the parking spaces would serve the existing three-bedroom house while one space would be allocated to each new unit per the ADU/AUD standards the project uses.

After discussion, a commissioner moved to continue the matter to Phase 2 (HSSR/phase 2) with the HLC comments recorded on the public record; the motion was seconded and passed on a roll-call vote. The commission asked that the Phase 2 submission include updated elevations and site plans showing adjacent structures and street conditions, detailed window and siding sections to confirm exposed siding widths, and refined garage-door and porch/post details.