Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks Land And Easement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council clarifies vote will be on 10x16 egress easement at Shot Clock Park, not expanded outdoor seating
Summary
City councilors and staff told colleagues that an agenda item concerns a permanent 10-by-16-foot life-safety egress easement adjacent to a storefront near Shot Clock Park, and not a proposal to add 24 outdoor seats for the Crooked Cattle restaurant. No formal vote is recorded in the transcript excerpt.
Syracuse Common Councilors were told an item on the agenda concerns a 10-by-16-foot permanent egress easement for life-safety reasons near Shot Clock Park and is not a vote to allow additional outdoor seating for the nearby Crooked Cattle restaurant.
The clarification came after Councilor Williams asked whether the council was being asked to approve what had been reported in the newspaper about seating for 24 additional patrons in Shot Clock Park. A speaker identified in the meeting as Commissioner of Assessment said the council was being asked to act on a 10-by-16 egress easement and that draft language will include a restriction against placing tables in the egress path: "language includes restriction on even placing tables, in the path of egress." The commissioner also said the easement is for life-safety reasons and will run with the land.
Councilors sought further detail about ownership and precedent. One councilor noted the parcel at issue is city-owned and not formally dedicated as a park; another councilor compared the situation to past leases of city property to restaurants, saying the city has leased similar parcels before. Staff said the city will draft the easement language and that the item before council is limited to the egress easement, not a park alienation or a lease allowing expanded public seating.
No formal vote or final action on the easement is recorded in the available transcript excerpt; councilors asked for clarity and confirmed the item would return for action with drafted language.
The council discussion emphasized the narrow scope of the agenda item and the city ownership of the parcel. Councilors also requested follow-up details about maintenance responsibility for the parcel and confirmation that the easement would be confined to life-safety access.
