Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Control topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lake Elsinore council adopts resolution opposing state interference in local land-use authority
Summary
The City Council voted 4-0 to adopt a resolution opposing what staff described as state laws and mandates that limit local control of land-use decisions. Councilmembers expressed unified support; the resolution directs staff to pursue follow-up actions and preserves public input protections.
The Lake Elsinore City Council on April 28 voted 4-0 to adopt a resolution opposing state actions the staff presentation said undermine local land-use authority and public participation in planning decisions.
Gina Gonzalez, director of economic development and the city’s legislative affairs lead, told the council the resolution responds to state housing mandates and laws — including multiple bills and RHNA allocations — that staff said can limit the city’s ability to enforce local zoning, environmental review and infrastructure planning. Gonzalez cited examples by number in her presentation, including Assembly Bill 337 (historical reference), Senate Bill 63 and Assembly Bill 211, and singled out recent laws she said move housing toward a by-right approval model.
"The core of these laws are really to move to a by right model for housing development that really cuts out our public participation," Gonzalez said in the presentation summary to the council.
Mayor Pro Tem McGee and Councilmembers Sheridan and Johnson spoke in favor of the resolution. McGee called it a response to "systematic" state changes that affect local control and praised staff’s report; Sheridan said he supported the resolution but added it "isn’t the way to go about getting it resolved" (referring to next steps). Councilwoman Johnson moved the resolution; Mayor Pro Tem McGee seconded. The motion carried, 4-0. The council packet listed the item as the proposed resolution to oppose "the state of California interfering with the city's land use authority." No fiscal impacts were reported at the meeting.
The council also handled related procedural business in the same session. The city approved its consent calendar (items 5–23) by motion of Councilwoman Johnson, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem McGee, 4-0. The successor agency consent calendar (six items) passed by motion of Councilwoman Johnson, seconded by Councilmember Sheridan, 4-0. The council appointed Andy Pease to the Planning Commission, District 5, by unanimous consent; Councilmember McGee noted Pease’s neighborhood volunteer history and construction background when introducing the appointment.
A member of the public, John Greer, used the three-minute public comment period to ask about contractor licensing for curb-and-gutter sidewalk projects and said he had previously bid similar work but was told the current solicitation required a larger license class; staff said the public works director or city manager could follow up and provide an answer.
