Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Court of Appeals holds show‑cause hearing after petition contained AI‑generated, nonexistent authorities

3085810 · April 22, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Utah Court of Appeals held a hearing after a petition was filed containing case citations generated by AI that were incorrect or nonexistent; petitioners' counsel acknowledged a law clerk used ChatGPT and the firm offered to pay opposing counsel's costs.

A three-judge panel of the Utah Court of Appeals held an Order to Show Cause hearing after a petition for interlocutory relief filed in Gardner v. Cadence included case citations that do not exist or that were cited to support propositions they do not actually hold. Counsel for the petition's filers acknowledged that a law clerk used ChatGPT to draft portions of the filing and that the firm failed to verify the authority before filing. The court said it would take the matter under advisement.

"This filing was a serious mistake," Matthew Barnett told the panel on behalf of respondents to the show‑cause order, explaining that the petition bore the name of Douglas D'Urbano but was signed and filed by Richard Bednar. Barnett said Bednar had not reviewed every citation and that a law clerk had used ChatGPT to draft portions of the petition. "He did not know that AI had been used to generate anything in connection…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans