Votes at a glance: Board approves bus leases, roof repairs and technology purchases

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its meeting trustees approved three procurement motions — two bus leases, summer roof replacements, and the technology device contract — all by unanimous voice vote.

The Waterford School District Board of Education recorded four formal approvals during the meeting: two multi-year bus lease agreements, an award for partial roof replacements at three high schools, and the technology device contract described in a separate information item. All motions passed unanimously by voice/hand vote (6-0).

Summary of actions

1) School bus leases (Superintendent recommendation 54‑24‑25): The board approved a three‑year lease with Hoekstra Transportation for two 54‑passenger buses at $26,452 each (annual cost stated as $52,904) and two 77‑passenger buses at $27,503 each (annual cost stated as $55,006). Funding source: general fund. Motion moved by Treasurer Donahue; carried 6-0.

2) School bus leases (Superintendent recommendation 55‑24‑25): The board approved a three‑year lease for three 54‑passenger buses with orthopedic lifts at $29,807 each (annual cost stated as $89,421) to meet specialized transportation needs. Funding source: general fund. Motion moved by Treasurer Donahue; carried 6-0.

3) Roof replacements, summer 2025 (Superintendent recommendation 56‑24‑25): The board awarded a contract to Royal Roofing for partial roof replacements: $639,800 for Kettering High School, $1,394,700 for Mott High School, and $255,600 for Clery (as listed in the packet). Funds for these projects are in the 20‑20 bond. Motion carried 6-0.

4) Technology device update (Superintendent recommendation 57‑24‑25): The board awarded REMC bid contracts to People Driven Technology ($872,851.50) and CDW G ($23,175) for devices and server replacements to support instruction and assessments. Motion carried 6-0.

Each approved motion was presented as written in the agenda packet and carried by voice/hand vote. Where the meeting record shows a move and a generic “Support,” the second was not identified by name in the transcript; totals were reported as “Motion carries 6‑0.”