Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Procedural Rules topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Presentation reviews Englewood's 2024 updates to Robert's Rules of Order

3045775 · April 18, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff reviewed a one-page guide to Robert's Rules and Englewood's 2024 ordinance changes covering recusal, debate closing, a point of decorum, and executive session motions.

Staff presented a one-page reference summarizing Robert's Rules of Order and the small changes Englewood adopted in 2024. The resource is intended as a practical guide for board members to run meetings efficiently and to clarify several points of procedure.

Presenter materials noted the city produced an annotated copy of the rules and provided a copy of the ordinance that made the local changes. The presentation covered four specific local modifications: allowing a recused member to remain in the meeting room (consistent with Colorado open meetings law) while not debating or voting; permitting the maker of a motion to both open and close debate on that motion; adding a formal point of decorum to address disruptive behavior; and clarifying procedure for motions to go into executive session, including debate over whether a proposed executive session topic is appropriate.

During discussion a board member asked whether the test for whether a topic is appropriate for executive session is defined in Robert's Rules or is jurisdiction specific. Staff responded that it is jurisdiction specific and agreed to follow up with Englewood's specific guidance and to circulate the materials to board members.

Board members said the one-page summary would be useful for new-member packets. Staff noted appendices in the published Robert's Rules that list motion types, thresholds, and timing for motions such as a motion to reconsider.

No formal action or vote on the rules themselves was recorded; staff offered to distribute the annotated packet and the ordinance language to the board.