Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Aduh Lot Splits Sbnbuilding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Weiner’s SB 677 would change SB 9 lot‑split rules; author says owner‑occupancy requirement will be reinstated in revised form
Summary
Sen. Weiner presented SB 677 as a package of fixes to earlier state laws (including SB 9) to make lot splits and small‑scale homebuilding more feasible. He said he will amend the bill to reinstate an owner‑occupancy requirement in a modified form and to limit combining small lots from taking projects out of affordability rules.
Sen. Weiner said SB 677 is designed to strengthen two laws that encourage smaller‑scale housing — SB 9 (duplexes and lot splits) and SB 423 (streamlining law for qualifying projects) — by removing implementation barriers that have prevented broader use.
Key changes the author described include allowing lot splits on adjacent lots (to enable townhome designs that spread fixed costs), prohibiting deed restrictions that block small SB 9 projects from financing, and restoring a form of owner‑occupancy that the author said will make SB 9 workable in practice.
The author emphasized the bill’s intent to avoid enabling large speculative projects while enabling small builders and homeowners to create additional homes that can be affordable and attainable. “We are not trying to let hedge funds buy up neighborhoods,” he said; he also acknowledged critics and pledged amendments to address concerns about gentrification, affordability carve‑outs and impact fees.
Opponents included the California Association of Realtors, which warned the bill’s changes to owner occupancy and affidavit/verification could open the door to investor purchases and undermine protections for communities of color and lower‑wealth homeowners. Labor organizations and building trades raised concerns about preemption of labor standards and environmental and infrastructure review if projects use ministerial approval and streamlining.
Supporters included AARP (arguing SB 677 would help create housing options that let families age in place) and smaller developers who said high upfront costs, lengthy permit timelines and fees make small lot projects infeasible under current rules. Several committee members urged targeted fixes: clearer anti‑speculation language tied to deed restrictions and limits on combining lots into large projects; clearer rules on impact fees and environmental exclusions; and stronger enforcement language to prevent circumvention.
Sen. Weiner told the committee he will work on amendments, including reinstating an owner occupancy requirement in a modified manner, clarifying that combining lots into large projects will not inherit the same ministerial exemptions, and addressing local review timelines and shot clock asymmetries. The bill was placed on call for a later vote while those conversations continue.
