Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Social Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County victim-services coordinator reports quarterly caseload and services provided
Summary
The county’s victim-services coordinator reported 17 victims served in the quarter (January–March), including new intakes and continued cases, and described services funded by a federal grant and the county.
Get email alerts on the Social Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Garfield County victim-services coordinator delivered the program’s quarterly report to the commission, saying the program assisted 17 victims between January and March and used grant funds to pay for emergency needs and counseling.
What the report said: The coordinator reported 17 total victims in the quarter, including six new clients and 11 continuing cases. Case types included adult physical assault (9), adult sexual assault (2), child physical abuse (2), child sexual abuse (1) and threats of violence (3). The coordinator described assistance that included hotel rooms, food and safety planning funded from a federal victim-services grant.
Program operations and funding: The coordinator said the program helps victims navigate law enforcement and court processes, provides safety planning and counseling referrals, and uses grant funds to cover emergent shelter and food when needed. The coordinator said the program is moving some grant-line items—such as equipment and training—so that funds can be used efficiently for client needs and local training. The county reported the program was budgeted and that some costs are covered by the county in addition to the grant.
Why it matters: The report highlights ongoing demand for victim services in the county and the role of the coordinator in providing crisis support, court notice and referrals to counseling. Commissioners praised the service and noted it helps law enforcement and the prosecutor’s office in handling victim needs.
Ending: The commission acknowledged the work and directed staff to continue coordinating training and funding use; no vote was required for the informational report.
