Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Minor Subdivision topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Commission approves Valle del Sol minor subdivision to split 151-acre parcel; 83 acres to conservation easement
Summary
Planning commissioners approved a coastal development permit and tentative map to subdivide a 151-acre parcel near Marina into two parcels — one approximately 83 acres to be conserved to satisfy mitigation for adjacent development, and one approximately 68 acres to remain in agricultural use.
Get email alerts on the Minor Subdivision topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Planning Commission unanimously approved a minor subdivision April 30 that would split a 151-acre parcel in the North County coastal planning area into two parcels, about 83 acres and about 68 acres, with the larger parcel slated for conservation to satisfy mitigation obligations tied to nearby Marina Station development.
Steve Mason, housing and community development staff, said the remainder parcel is part of the earlier Armstrong Sand Veil Ranch subdivision and includes areas identified as potential Monterey spineflower habitat and two vernal ponds. Mason said 83 acres of the remainder parcel are intended to be conserved and restored to mitigate impacts from a Marina development; written monitoring reports would be submitted to the City of Marina annually.
Attorney Anthony Lombardo, representing the property owner, described this step as completing settlement conditions from prior approvals: "Part of the settlement was the dedication of this acreage into open space," Lombardo said. He added the conservation parcel "would be deeded to a conservation organization," and staff identified the Big Sur Land Trust as a likely recipient.
Why it matters: The conservation parcel would satisfy mitigation obligations in related Marina project litigation and preserve potential sensitive habitat. Staff recommended a categorical CEQA exemption, citing minor land-use alterations and transfers to preserve natural conditions, and recommended approval of the coastal development permit and tentative map.
Commissioner Shaw moved to approve the permit and tentative map; Commissioner Mendoza seconded. The motion carried unanimously; no public speakers opposed the project.
Ending: Staff said no development is proposed on either parcel and that ownership of the restoration parcel would ultimately transfer to a conservation agency. Monitoring and habitat-restoration conditions will accompany the permit.

