Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Clemmons leaders, residents urge withdrawal of House Bill 765, warn it would curb local land‑use control

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At a special April 23 meeting, Village of Clemmons Councilman Mike Thomas and residents criticized House Bill 765 and related measures introduced in Raleigh, saying the bills would limit local planning authority, raise density mandates, and shift regulatory decisions to the state; attendees were urged to contact sponsors and ask them to withdraw.

CLEMMONS, N.C. — Village of Clemmons Councilman Mike Thomas told a packed special meeting on April 23 that House Bill 765 and several companion bills introduced in the North Carolina General Assembly would “fundamentally change Clemmons as we know it today” and asked residents to press legislators to withdraw the measures.

Thomas led a roughly 30‑minute presentation that focused on five bills he described as the most impactful of a larger legislative package. He said one provision would require an official assessment by the (as presented) “Physical Research Division” whenever a proposed law could affect the net cost of housing; the presenter argued that the bills themselves lacked the assessments they would mandate.

“The more I read about this legislation and study it, the more clear it becomes that if this legislation passes, it will…fundamentally change Clemmons as we know it today,” Thomas said in his presentation. He also urged constituents to ask sponsors to withdraw the bills: “Withdraw it if you're a sponsor. Withdraw your sponsorship.”

Why it matters

Thomas told attendees he believes the bills would remove key local zoning tools — including parking and lot‑size rules — set minimum residential densities (he cited a minimum of five dwellings per acre as written in the bill text he presented) and expose local elected and appointed board members to new legal liability for land‑use decisions. He said those…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans